# LTS Termination Proof

by T2Cert

## Input

Integer Transition System
• Initial Location: 4
• Transitions: (pre-variables and post-variables)  0 0 1: ___const_10_0 − i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_post + tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_post − tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_0 + tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_0 − tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_post + i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ i4_post − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_0 + i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ i4_0 − i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_10_0 − ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 0 1 2: 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − ___const_10_0 + i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ −1 − i4_0 + i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 + i4_0 − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ i4_0 − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_0 + i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_post + tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_post − tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_0 + tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_0 − tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_10_0 − ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 2 2 0: − tmp_post + tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_post − tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_0 + tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_0 − tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_post + i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ i4_post − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_0 + i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ i4_0 − i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_10_0 − ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 3 3 2: 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ i4_0 − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_0 + i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_0 − tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_0 + tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_10_0 − ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 4 4 3: − tmp_post + tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_post − tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_0 + tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_0 − tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_post + i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ i4_post − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_0 + i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ i4_0 − i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_10_0 − ___const_10_0 ≤ 0

## Proof

### 1 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:
 2 5 2: − tmp_post + tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_post − tmp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − tmp_0 + tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ tmp_0 − tmp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_post + i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ i4_post − i4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − i4_0 + i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ i4_0 − i4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_10_0 − ___const_10_0 ≤ 0
and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

### 2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 0, 3, 4 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −13.

 4: 0 3: 0 0: 0 2: 0 1: 0 4: −5 3: −6 0: −7 2: −7 2_var_snapshot: −7 2*: −7 1: −8

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

2* 8 2: tmp_post + tmp_post ≤ 0tmp_posttmp_post ≤ 0tmp_0 + tmp_0 ≤ 0tmp_0tmp_0 ≤ 0i4_post + i4_post ≤ 0i4_posti4_post ≤ 0i4_0 + i4_0 ≤ 0i4_0i4_0 ≤ 0___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0___const_10_0___const_10_0 ≤ 0

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

2 6 2_var_snapshot: tmp_post + tmp_post ≤ 0tmp_posttmp_post ≤ 0tmp_0 + tmp_0 ≤ 0tmp_0tmp_0 ≤ 0i4_post + i4_post ≤ 0i4_posti4_post ≤ 0i4_0 + i4_0 ≤ 0i4_0i4_0 ≤ 0___const_10_0 + ___const_10_0 ≤ 0___const_10_0___const_10_0 ≤ 0

### 5 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 1 SCC(s) of the program graph.

### 5.1 SCC Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider the SCC { 0, 2, 2_var_snapshot, 2* }.

### 5.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 1 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 2.

 0: −1 + 4⋅___const_10_0 − 4⋅i4_0 2: 1 + 4⋅___const_10_0 − 4⋅i4_0 2_var_snapshot: 4⋅___const_10_0 − 4⋅i4_0 2*: 2 + 4⋅___const_10_0 − 4⋅i4_0

### 5.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 6, 8, 2 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −1.

 0: −1 2: 1 2_var_snapshot: 0 2*: 2

### 5.1.3 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

We consider 1 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.

### 5.1.3.1 Cut-Point Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider cut-point transition 5.

### 5.1.3.1.1 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.

T2Cert

• version: 1.0