by T2Cert
0 | 0 | 1: | ___const_36_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 | |
0 | 1 | 2: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − ___const_36_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ −1 − z_0 + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 + z_0 − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 − counter_0 + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 + counter_0 − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 | |
3 | 2 | 2: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 | |
3 | 3 | 1: | 1 + ___const_127_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 | |
2 | 4 | 0: | − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 | |
4 | 5 | 3: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 | |
5 | 6 | 4: | − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 |
The following invariants are asserted.
0: | TRUE |
1: | TRUE |
2: | TRUE |
3: | counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 ≤ 0 |
4: | TRUE |
5: | TRUE |
The invariants are proved as follows.
0 | (0) | TRUE | ||
1 | (1) | TRUE | ||
2 | (2) | TRUE | ||
3 | (3) | counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 ≤ 0 | ||
4 | (4) | TRUE | ||
5 | (5) | TRUE |
0 | 0 1 | |
0 | 1 2 | |
2 | 4 0 | |
3 | 2 2 | |
3 | 3 1 | |
4 | 5 3 | |
5 | 6 4 |
2 | 7 | : | − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 |
We remove transitions
, , , , using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −15.5: | 0 |
4: | 0 |
3: | 0 |
0: | 0 |
2: | 0 |
1: | 0 |
: | −6 |
: | −7 |
: | −8 |
: | −9 |
: | −9 |
: | −9 |
: | −9 |
: | −13 |
8 | lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] |
lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] |
The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.
10 : − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0
The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.
8 : − z_post + z_post ≤ 0 ∧ z_post − z_post ≤ 0 ∧ − z_0 + z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ z_0 − z_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_0 + y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_0 − y_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_post + counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ counter_post − counter_post ≤ 0 ∧ − counter_0 + counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ counter_0 − counter_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_36_0 + ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_36_0 − ___const_36_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − ___const_127_0 + ___const_127_0 ≤ 0 ∧ ___const_127_0 − ___const_127_0 ≤ 0
We consider subproblems for each of the 1 SCC(s) of the program graph.
Here we consider the SCC {
, , , }.We remove transition
using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.: | −1 + 2⋅___const_36_0 − 2⋅counter_0 |
: | 2⋅___const_36_0 − 2⋅counter_0 |
: | 2⋅___const_36_0 − 2⋅counter_0 |
: | 2⋅___const_36_0 − 2⋅counter_0 |
8 | lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0] ] |
10 | lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0] ] |
lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0] ] |
We remove transitions 8, 10, using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −1.
: | −1 |
: | 1 |
: | 0 |
: | 2 |
8 | lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] |
10 | lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] |
lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] |
We consider 1 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.
There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.
T2Cert