LTS Termination Proof

by AProVE

Input

Integer Transition System

Proof

1 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:
l5 l5 l5: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
l4 l4 l4: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
l7 l7 l7: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
l6 l6 l6: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
l8 l8 l8: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
l3 l3 l3: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
l0 l0 l0: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
l2 l2 l2: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3x4 = x4x5 = x5x6 = x6x7 = x7x8 = x8x9 = x9
and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

2 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 2 SCC(s) of the program graph.

2.1 SCC Subproblem 1/2

Here we consider the SCC { l5, l4 }.

2.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 7 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l4: 2⋅x3 − 2⋅x8 − 1
l5: 2⋅x3 − 2⋅x8

2.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transition 5 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l4: 0
l5: −1

2.1.3 Trivial Cooperation Program

There are no more "sharp" transitions in the cooperation program. Hence the cooperation termination is proved.

2.2 SCC Subproblem 2/2

Here we consider the SCC { l3, l2 }.

2.2.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 4 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l2: 2⋅x1 − 2⋅x9 − 1
l3: 2⋅x1 − 2⋅x9

2.2.2 Transition Removal

We remove transition 2 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l2: 0
l3: −1

2.2.3 Trivial Cooperation Program

There are no more "sharp" transitions in the cooperation program. Hence the cooperation termination is proved.

Tool configuration

AProVE