LTS Termination Proof

by T2Cert

Input

Integer Transition System

Initial Location: 5

Transitions: (pre-variables and post-variables)

0	0	1:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ −20 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0
0	1	2:	21 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
3	2	0:	− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
2	3	0:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ −30 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − x_5_0 + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + x_5_0 − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
2	4	4:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 31 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − y_6_0 + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + y_6_0 − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
4	5	2:	− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
5	6	3:	− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

Proof

1 Invariant Updates

The following invariants are asserted.

0:	TRUE
1:	−20 + x_5_0 ≤ 0
2:	21 − x_5_0 ≤ 0
3:	TRUE
4:	21 − x_5_0 ≤ 0
5:	TRUE

The invariants are proved as follows.

IMPACT Invariant Proof

nodes (location) invariant:

0	(0)	TRUE
1	(1)	−20 + x_5_0 ≤ 0
2	(2)	21 − x_5_0 ≤ 0
3	(3)	TRUE
4	(4)	21 − x_5_0 ≤ 0
5	(5)	TRUE

initial node: 5
cover edges:
transition edges:

0 0 1

0 1 2

2 3 0

2 4 4

3 2 0

4 5 2

5 6 3

2 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:

0	7	0:	− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
2	14	2:	− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

3 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 0, 2, 6 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −15.

5:	0
3:	0
0:	0
2:	0
4:	0
1:	0
5:	−5
3:	−6
0:	−7
2:	−7
4:	−7
0_var_snapshot:	−7
0*:	−7
2_var_snapshot:	−7
2*:	−7
1:	−13

Hints:

8	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
15	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
1	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
3	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
4	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
5	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
0	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
2	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
6	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

4 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

0* 10 0: − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

5 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

0 8 0_var_snapshot: − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

6 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

2* 17 2: − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

7 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

2 15 2_var_snapshot: − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

8 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 1 SCC(s) of the program graph.

8.1 SCC Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider the SCC { 0, 2, 4, 0_var_snapshot, 0*, 2_var_snapshot, 2* }.

8.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 4 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 249.

0:	4 + 6⋅x_5_0 + 4⋅y_6_0
2:	1 + 6⋅x_5_0 + 4⋅y_6_0
4:	3 + 6⋅x_5_0 + 4⋅y_6_0
0_var_snapshot:	3 + 6⋅x_5_0 + 4⋅y_6_0
0*:	5 + 6⋅x_5_0 + 4⋅y_6_0
2_var_snapshot:	6⋅x_5_0 + 4⋅y_6_0
2*:	2 + 6⋅x_5_0 + 4⋅y_6_0

Hints:

8	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
10	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
15	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
17	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
1	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
3	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
4	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [6, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
5	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

8.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 15, 17, 1, 3, 5 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 125.

0:	4 + 6⋅x_5_0
2:	1 + 6⋅x_5_0
4:	3 + 6⋅x_5_0
0_var_snapshot:	3 + 6⋅x_5_0
0*:	5 + 6⋅x_5_0
2_var_snapshot:	6⋅x_5_0
2*:	2 + 6⋅x_5_0

Hints:

8	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
10	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
15	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
17	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
1	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
3	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
5	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

8.1.3 Transition Removal

We remove transition 8 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −1.

0:	0
2:	0
4:	0
0_var_snapshot:	−1
0*:	1
2_var_snapshot:	0
2*:	0

Hints:

8	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
10	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

8.1.4 Transition Removal

We remove transition 10 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −1.

0:	−1
2:	0
4:	0
0_var_snapshot:	0
0*:	0
2_var_snapshot:	0
2*:	0

Hints:

10	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

8.1.5 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

We consider 2 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.

8.1.5.1 Cut-Point Subproblem 1/2

Here we consider cut-point transition 7.

8.1.5.1.1 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.

8.1.5.2 Cut-Point Subproblem 2/2

Here we consider cut-point transition 14.

8.1.5.2.1 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.

Tool configuration

T2Cert

version: 1.0