LTS Termination Proof

by T2Cert

Input

Integer Transition System

Initial Location: 6

Transitions: (pre-variables and post-variables)

0	0	1:	1 + x_5_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
1	1	2:	− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
2	2	3:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − y_6_0 + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + y_6_0 − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
0	3	4:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
5	4	3:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
3	5	0:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 + x_5_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 − x_5_0 + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 + x_5_0 − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0
3	6	4:	0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
6	7	5:	− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

Proof

1 Invariant Updates

The following invariants are asserted.

0:	−1 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
1:	−1 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
2:	−1 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
3:	b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 ≤ 0
4:	− b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 ≤ 0
5:	TRUE
6:	TRUE

The invariants are proved as follows.

IMPACT Invariant Proof

nodes (location) invariant:

0	(0)	−1 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
1	(1)	−1 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
2	(2)	−1 + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − b_7_0 ≤ 0
3	(3)	b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 ≤ 0
4	(4)	− b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 ≤ 0
5	(5)	TRUE
6	(6)	TRUE

initial node: 6
cover edges:
transition edges:

0 0 1

0 3 4

1 1 2

2 2 3

3 5 0

3 6 4

5 4 3

6 7 5

2 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:

− y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

3 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 3, 4, 6, 7 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −13.

6:	0
5:	0
0:	0
1:	0
2:	0
3:	0
4:	0
6:	−5
5:	−6
0:	−7
1:	−7
2:	−7
3:	−7
3_var_snapshot:	−7
3*:	−7
4:	−11

Hints:

9	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
0	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
1	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
2	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
5	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
3	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
4	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
6	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
7	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

4 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

3* 11 3: − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

5 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

3 9 3_var_snapshot: − y_6_post + y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_post − y_6_post ≤ 0 ∧ − y_6_0 + y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ y_6_0 − y_6_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_post + x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_post − x_5_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_5_0 + x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_5_0 − x_5_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_post + b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_post − b_7_post ≤ 0 ∧ − b_7_0 + b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ b_7_0 − b_7_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_post + Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_post − Result_4_post ≤ 0 ∧ − Result_4_0 + Result_4_0 ≤ 0 ∧ Result_4_0 − Result_4_0 ≤ 0

6 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 1 SCC(s) of the program graph.

6.1 SCC Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider the SCC { 0, 1, 2, 3, 3_var_snapshot, 3* }.

6.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 0, 5 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 1.

0:	1 − 2⋅x_5_0 + 2⋅y_6_0
1:	−2⋅x_5_0 + 2⋅y_6_0
2:	−2⋅x_5_0 + 2⋅y_6_0
3:	1 − 2⋅x_5_0 + 2⋅y_6_0
3_var_snapshot:	−2⋅x_5_0 + 2⋅y_6_0
3*:	2 − 2⋅x_5_0 + 2⋅y_6_0

Hints:

9	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
11	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
0	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
1	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
2	lexWeak[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
5	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

6.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 9, 11, 1, 2 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −2.

0:	0
1:	1 + b_7_0
2:	b_7_0
3:	−1
3_var_snapshot:	−2
3*:	0

Hints:

9	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
11	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
1	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]
2	lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ]

6.1.3 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

We consider 1 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.

6.1.3.1 Cut-Point Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider cut-point transition 8.

6.1.3.1.1 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.

Tool configuration

T2Cert

version: 1.0