Termination proof
1: switching to dependency pairs
The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
a__f#(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
|
→ |
a__f#(
mark(
X
)
,
f(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
)
|
a__f#(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
|
→ |
mark#(
X
)
|
mark#(
f(
X1
,
X2
)
)
|
→ |
a__f#(
mark(
X1
)
,
X2
)
|
mark#(
f(
X1
,
X2
)
)
|
→ |
mark#(
X1
)
|
mark#(
g(
X
)
)
|
→ |
mark#(
X
)
|
1.1: reduction pair processor
Using the following reduction pair
Linear polynomial
interpretation over
the naturals
[mark
(x1)
]
|
= |
2
x1
|
[f
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
3
x1
+
1
|
[mark#
(x1)
]
|
= |
2
x1
|
[a__f
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
3
x1
+
2
|
[a__f#
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
2
x1
|
[g
(x1)
]
|
= |
2
x1
|
[f(x1, ..., xn)]
|
= |
x1 + ... + xn + 1
|
for all other symbols f of arity n
|
one remains with the following pair(s).
a__f#(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
|
→ |
a__f#(
mark(
X
)
,
f(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
)
|
a__f#(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
|
→ |
mark#(
X
)
|
mark#(
g(
X
)
)
|
→ |
mark#(
X
)
|
1.1.1: dependency graph processor
The dependency pairs are split into 2 component(s).
-
The
1st
component contains the
pair(s)
a__f#(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
|
→ |
a__f#(
mark(
X
)
,
f(
g(
X
)
,
Y
)
)
|
1.1.1.1: reduction pair processor
Using the following reduction pair
Linear polynomial
interpretation over
the naturals
[mark
(x1)
]
|
= |
x1
|
[f
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
0
|
[a__f
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
0
|
[a__f#
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
3
x1 +
3
x2
|
[g
(x1)
]
|
= |
2
x1
+
3
|
[f(x1, ..., xn)]
|
= |
x1 + ... + xn + 1
|
for all other symbols f of arity n
|
one remains with the following pair(s).
1.1.1.1.1: P is empty
All dependency pairs have been removed.
-
The
2nd
component contains the
pair(s)
mark#(
g(
X
)
)
|
→ |
mark#(
X
)
|
1.1.1.2: reduction pair processor
Using the following reduction pair
Linear polynomial
interpretation over
the naturals
[mark
(x1)
]
|
= |
3
x1
+
2
|
[f
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
3
|
[mark#
(x1)
]
|
= |
2
x1
|
[a__f
(x1, x2)
]
|
= |
3
|
[g
(x1)
]
|
= |
3
x1
+
2
|
[f(x1, ..., xn)]
|
= |
x1 + ... + xn + 1
|
for all other symbols f of arity n
|
one remains with the following pair(s).
1.1.1.2.1: P is empty
All dependency pairs have been removed.