Certification Problem                    
                
Input (COPS 323)
The rewrite relation of the following conditional TRS is considered.
| 
f(x) | 
→ | 
c(x,y) | 
 | g(x) ≈ y, y ≈ h(x) | 
| a | 
→ | 
b | 
| 
g(a) | 
→ | 
h(b) | 
Property / Task
Prove or disprove confluence.Answer / Result
No.Proof (by ConCon @ CoCo 2020)
1 Inlining of Conditions
      Inlining of conditions results in the following transformed CTRS having the
      same multistep rewrite relation.
      
| 
f(x) | 
→ | 
c(x,g(x)) | 
 | g(x) ≈ h(x) | 
| a | 
→ | 
b | 
| 
g(a) | 
→ | 
h(b) | 
1.1 Non-Joinable Fork
        The system is not confluent due to the following forking derivations.  
        
        The two resulting terms cannot be joined for the following reason:
        - The terms are distinct normal forms.