Certification Problem

Input (TPDB SRS_Standard/Secret_07_SRS/dj)

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

1(0(x1)) 0(0(0(1(x1)))) (1)
0(1(x1)) 1(x1) (2)
1(1(x1)) 0(0(0(0(x1)))) (3)
0(0(x1)) 0(x1) (4)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by matchbox @ termCOMP 2023)

1 Rule Removal

Using the matrix interpretations of dimension 1 with strict dimension 1 over the rationals with delta = 1
[1(x1)] = x1 +
1
[0(x1)] = x1 +
0
all of the following rules can be deleted.
1(1(x1)) 0(0(0(0(x1)))) (3)

1.1 Dependency Pair Transformation

The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
1#(0(x1)) 1#(x1) (5)
1#(0(x1)) 0#(1(x1)) (6)
1#(0(x1)) 0#(0(1(x1))) (7)
1#(0(x1)) 0#(0(0(1(x1)))) (8)

1.1.1 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules

Using the matrix interpretations of dimension 1 with strict dimension 1 over the rationals with delta = 1
[1(x1)] = x1 +
0
[0(x1)] = x1 +
0
[1#(x1)] = x1 +
1
[0#(x1)] = x1 +
0
together with the usable rules
1(0(x1)) 0(0(0(1(x1)))) (1)
0(1(x1)) 1(x1) (2)
0(0(x1)) 0(x1) (4)
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair), the pairs
1#(0(x1)) 0#(1(x1)) (6)
1#(0(x1)) 0#(0(1(x1))) (7)
1#(0(x1)) 0#(0(0(1(x1)))) (8)
and no rules could be deleted.

1.1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor

The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.