The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| c(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a(a(b(a(a(b(c(b(a(c(x1)))))))))) | (1) |
| c#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (2) |
| c#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(a(c(x1)))) | (3) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| c#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (2) |
| c#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(a(c(x1)))) | (3) |
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [c#(x1)] | = |
|
| c(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a(a(b(a(a(b(c(b(a(c(x1)))))))))) | (1) |
| c#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (2) |
| c#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(a(c(x1)))) | (3) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.