MAYBE

We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate MAYBE.

Strict Trs:
  { pred(s(x)) -> x
  , minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
  , minus(x, 0()) -> x
  , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
  , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0()
  , log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0()))))))
  , log(s(0())) -> 0() }
Obligation:
  runtime complexity
Answer:
  MAYBE

None of the processors succeeded.

Details of failed attempt(s):
-----------------------------
1) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
   
   None of the processors succeeded.
   
   Details of failed attempt(s):
   -----------------------------
   1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)'
      failed due to the following reason:
      
      Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds.
   
   2) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed
      due to the following reason:
      
      None of the processors succeeded.
      
      Details of failed attempt(s):
      -----------------------------
      1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
         failed due to the following reason:
         
         match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
      
      2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
         failed due to the following reason:
         
         match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
      
   
   3) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
      
      None of the processors succeeded.
      
      Details of failed attempt(s):
      -----------------------------
      1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the
         following reason:
         
         The processor is inapplicable, reason:
           Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis
      
      2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due
         to the following reason:
         
         The processor is inapplicable, reason:
           Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis
      
   

2) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed
   due to the following reason:
   
   We add the following weak dependency pairs:
   
   Strict DPs:
     { pred^#(s(x)) -> c_1(x)
     , minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(pred^#(minus(x, y)))
     , minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x)
     , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y)))
     , quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_5()
     , log^#(s(s(x))) -> c_6(log^#(s(quot(x, s(s(0()))))))
     , log^#(s(0())) -> c_7() }
   
   and mark the set of starting terms.
   
   We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
   certificate MAYBE.
   
   Strict DPs:
     { pred^#(s(x)) -> c_1(x)
     , minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(pred^#(minus(x, y)))
     , minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x)
     , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y)))
     , quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_5()
     , log^#(s(s(x))) -> c_6(log^#(s(quot(x, s(s(0()))))))
     , log^#(s(0())) -> c_7() }
   Strict Trs:
     { pred(s(x)) -> x
     , minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
     , minus(x, 0()) -> x
     , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
     , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0()
     , log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0()))))))
     , log(s(0())) -> 0() }
   Obligation:
     runtime complexity
   Answer:
     MAYBE
   
   We estimate the number of application of {5,7} by applications of
   Pre({5,7}) = {1,3,4,6}. Here rules are labeled as follows:
   
     DPs:
       { 1: pred^#(s(x)) -> c_1(x)
       , 2: minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(pred^#(minus(x, y)))
       , 3: minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x)
       , 4: quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y)))
       , 5: quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_5()
       , 6: log^#(s(s(x))) -> c_6(log^#(s(quot(x, s(s(0()))))))
       , 7: log^#(s(0())) -> c_7() }
   
   We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
   certificate MAYBE.
   
   Strict DPs:
     { pred^#(s(x)) -> c_1(x)
     , minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_2(pred^#(minus(x, y)))
     , minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x)
     , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_4(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y)))
     , log^#(s(s(x))) -> c_6(log^#(s(quot(x, s(s(0())))))) }
   Strict Trs:
     { pred(s(x)) -> x
     , minus(x, s(y)) -> pred(minus(x, y))
     , minus(x, 0()) -> x
     , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
     , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0()
     , log(s(s(x))) -> s(log(s(quot(x, s(s(0()))))))
     , log(s(0())) -> 0() }
   Weak DPs:
     { quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_5()
     , log^#(s(0())) -> c_7() }
   Obligation:
     runtime complexity
   Answer:
     MAYBE
   
   Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty.


Arrrr..