MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { 1024() -> 1024_1(0()) , 1024_1(x) -> if(lt(x, 10()), x) , if(true(), x) -> double(1024_1(s(x))) , if(false(), x) -> s(0()) , lt(x, 0()) -> false() , lt(0(), s(y)) -> true() , lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y) , 10() -> double(s(double(s(s(0()))))) , double(0()) -> 0() , double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x))) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { 1024^#() -> c_1(1024_1^#(0())) , 1024_1^#(x) -> c_2(if^#(lt(x, 10()), x)) , if^#(true(), x) -> c_3(double^#(1024_1(s(x)))) , if^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , double^#(0()) -> c_9() , double^#(s(x)) -> c_10(double^#(x)) , lt^#(x, 0()) -> c_5() , lt^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() , lt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(lt^#(x, y)) , 10^#() -> c_8(double^#(s(double(s(s(0())))))) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { 1024^#() -> c_1(1024_1^#(0())) , 1024_1^#(x) -> c_2(if^#(lt(x, 10()), x)) , if^#(true(), x) -> c_3(double^#(1024_1(s(x)))) , if^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , double^#(0()) -> c_9() , double^#(s(x)) -> c_10(double^#(x)) , lt^#(x, 0()) -> c_5() , lt^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() , lt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(lt^#(x, y)) , 10^#() -> c_8(double^#(s(double(s(s(0())))))) } Strict Trs: { 1024() -> 1024_1(0()) , 1024_1(x) -> if(lt(x, 10()), x) , if(true(), x) -> double(1024_1(s(x))) , if(false(), x) -> s(0()) , lt(x, 0()) -> false() , lt(0(), s(y)) -> true() , lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y) , 10() -> double(s(double(s(s(0()))))) , double(0()) -> 0() , double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x))) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {4,5,7,8} by applications of Pre({4,5,7,8}) = {2,3,6,9}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: 1024^#() -> c_1(1024_1^#(0())) , 2: 1024_1^#(x) -> c_2(if^#(lt(x, 10()), x)) , 3: if^#(true(), x) -> c_3(double^#(1024_1(s(x)))) , 4: if^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , 5: double^#(0()) -> c_9() , 6: double^#(s(x)) -> c_10(double^#(x)) , 7: lt^#(x, 0()) -> c_5() , 8: lt^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() , 9: lt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(lt^#(x, y)) , 10: 10^#() -> c_8(double^#(s(double(s(s(0())))))) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { 1024^#() -> c_1(1024_1^#(0())) , 1024_1^#(x) -> c_2(if^#(lt(x, 10()), x)) , if^#(true(), x) -> c_3(double^#(1024_1(s(x)))) , double^#(s(x)) -> c_10(double^#(x)) , lt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(lt^#(x, y)) , 10^#() -> c_8(double^#(s(double(s(s(0())))))) } Strict Trs: { 1024() -> 1024_1(0()) , 1024_1(x) -> if(lt(x, 10()), x) , if(true(), x) -> double(1024_1(s(x))) , if(false(), x) -> s(0()) , lt(x, 0()) -> false() , lt(0(), s(y)) -> true() , lt(s(x), s(y)) -> lt(x, y) , 10() -> double(s(double(s(s(0()))))) , double(0()) -> 0() , double(s(x)) -> s(s(double(x))) } Weak DPs: { if^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , double^#(0()) -> c_9() , lt^#(x, 0()) -> c_5() , lt^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..