MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { minus(x, 0()) -> x , minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z)) , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0() , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y))) , plus(s(x), x) -> plus(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x)) , plus(s(x), s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y))))) , plus(id(x), s(y)) -> s(plus(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) , plus(zero(), y) -> y , if(true(), x, y) -> x , if(false(), x, y) -> y , gt(s(x), s(y)) -> gt(x, y) , gt(s(x), zero()) -> true() , gt(zero(), y) -> false() , not(x) -> if(x, false(), true()) , id(x) -> x } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) , minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) , quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) , plus^#(s(x), x) -> c_6(plus^#(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x))) , plus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(plus^#(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y)))) , plus^#(id(x), s(y)) -> c_8(plus^#(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) , plus^#(zero(), y) -> c_9(y) , if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_10(x) , if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_11(y) , gt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_12(gt^#(x, y)) , gt^#(s(x), zero()) -> c_13() , gt^#(zero(), y) -> c_14() , not^#(x) -> c_15(if^#(x, false(), true())) , id^#(x) -> c_16(x) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) , minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) , quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) , plus^#(s(x), x) -> c_6(plus^#(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x))) , plus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(plus^#(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y)))) , plus^#(id(x), s(y)) -> c_8(plus^#(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) , plus^#(zero(), y) -> c_9(y) , if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_10(x) , if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_11(y) , gt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_12(gt^#(x, y)) , gt^#(s(x), zero()) -> c_13() , gt^#(zero(), y) -> c_14() , not^#(x) -> c_15(if^#(x, false(), true())) , id^#(x) -> c_16(x) } Strict Trs: { minus(x, 0()) -> x , minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z)) , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0() , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y))) , plus(s(x), x) -> plus(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x)) , plus(s(x), s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y))))) , plus(id(x), s(y)) -> s(plus(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) , plus(zero(), y) -> y , if(true(), x, y) -> x , if(false(), x, y) -> y , gt(s(x), s(y)) -> gt(x, y) , gt(s(x), zero()) -> true() , gt(zero(), y) -> false() , not(x) -> if(x, false(), true()) , id(x) -> x } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {4,13,14} by applications of Pre({4,13,14}) = {1,5,9,10,11,12,16}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) , 2: minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) , 3: minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) , 4: quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() , 5: quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) , 6: plus^#(s(x), x) -> c_6(plus^#(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x))) , 7: plus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(plus^#(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y)))) , 8: plus^#(id(x), s(y)) -> c_8(plus^#(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) , 9: plus^#(zero(), y) -> c_9(y) , 10: if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_10(x) , 11: if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_11(y) , 12: gt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_12(gt^#(x, y)) , 13: gt^#(s(x), zero()) -> c_13() , 14: gt^#(zero(), y) -> c_14() , 15: not^#(x) -> c_15(if^#(x, false(), true())) , 16: id^#(x) -> c_16(x) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) , minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) , plus^#(s(x), x) -> c_6(plus^#(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x))) , plus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(plus^#(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y)))) , plus^#(id(x), s(y)) -> c_8(plus^#(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) , plus^#(zero(), y) -> c_9(y) , if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_10(x) , if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_11(y) , gt^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_12(gt^#(x, y)) , not^#(x) -> c_15(if^#(x, false(), true())) , id^#(x) -> c_16(x) } Strict Trs: { minus(x, 0()) -> x , minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z)) , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0() , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y))) , plus(s(x), x) -> plus(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x)) , plus(s(x), s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y))))) , plus(id(x), s(y)) -> s(plus(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) , plus(zero(), y) -> y , if(true(), x, y) -> x , if(false(), x, y) -> y , gt(s(x), s(y)) -> gt(x, y) , gt(s(x), zero()) -> true() , gt(zero(), y) -> false() , not(x) -> if(x, false(), true()) , id(x) -> x } Weak DPs: { quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() , gt^#(s(x), zero()) -> c_13() , gt^#(zero(), y) -> c_14() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..