MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { f(s(x)) -> f(id_inc(c(x, x))) , f(c(s(x), y)) -> g(c(x, y)) , id_inc(s(x)) -> s(id_inc(x)) , id_inc(c(x, y)) -> c(id_inc(x), id_inc(y)) , id_inc(0()) -> s(0()) , id_inc(0()) -> 0() , g(c(x, x)) -> f(x) , g(c(x, s(y))) -> g(c(y, x)) , g(c(s(x), y)) -> g(c(y, x)) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { f^#(s(x)) -> c_1(f^#(id_inc(c(x, x)))) , f^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_2(g^#(c(x, y))) , g^#(c(x, x)) -> c_7(f^#(x)) , g^#(c(x, s(y))) -> c_8(g^#(c(y, x))) , g^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_9(g^#(c(y, x))) , id_inc^#(s(x)) -> c_3(id_inc^#(x)) , id_inc^#(c(x, y)) -> c_4(id_inc^#(x), id_inc^#(y)) , id_inc^#(0()) -> c_5() , id_inc^#(0()) -> c_6() } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(s(x)) -> c_1(f^#(id_inc(c(x, x)))) , f^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_2(g^#(c(x, y))) , g^#(c(x, x)) -> c_7(f^#(x)) , g^#(c(x, s(y))) -> c_8(g^#(c(y, x))) , g^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_9(g^#(c(y, x))) , id_inc^#(s(x)) -> c_3(id_inc^#(x)) , id_inc^#(c(x, y)) -> c_4(id_inc^#(x), id_inc^#(y)) , id_inc^#(0()) -> c_5() , id_inc^#(0()) -> c_6() } Strict Trs: { f(s(x)) -> f(id_inc(c(x, x))) , f(c(s(x), y)) -> g(c(x, y)) , id_inc(s(x)) -> s(id_inc(x)) , id_inc(c(x, y)) -> c(id_inc(x), id_inc(y)) , id_inc(0()) -> s(0()) , id_inc(0()) -> 0() , g(c(x, x)) -> f(x) , g(c(x, s(y))) -> g(c(y, x)) , g(c(s(x), y)) -> g(c(y, x)) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {8,9} by applications of Pre({8,9}) = {6,7}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: f^#(s(x)) -> c_1(f^#(id_inc(c(x, x)))) , 2: f^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_2(g^#(c(x, y))) , 3: g^#(c(x, x)) -> c_7(f^#(x)) , 4: g^#(c(x, s(y))) -> c_8(g^#(c(y, x))) , 5: g^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_9(g^#(c(y, x))) , 6: id_inc^#(s(x)) -> c_3(id_inc^#(x)) , 7: id_inc^#(c(x, y)) -> c_4(id_inc^#(x), id_inc^#(y)) , 8: id_inc^#(0()) -> c_5() , 9: id_inc^#(0()) -> c_6() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(s(x)) -> c_1(f^#(id_inc(c(x, x)))) , f^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_2(g^#(c(x, y))) , g^#(c(x, x)) -> c_7(f^#(x)) , g^#(c(x, s(y))) -> c_8(g^#(c(y, x))) , g^#(c(s(x), y)) -> c_9(g^#(c(y, x))) , id_inc^#(s(x)) -> c_3(id_inc^#(x)) , id_inc^#(c(x, y)) -> c_4(id_inc^#(x), id_inc^#(y)) } Strict Trs: { f(s(x)) -> f(id_inc(c(x, x))) , f(c(s(x), y)) -> g(c(x, y)) , id_inc(s(x)) -> s(id_inc(x)) , id_inc(c(x, y)) -> c(id_inc(x), id_inc(y)) , id_inc(0()) -> s(0()) , id_inc(0()) -> 0() , g(c(x, x)) -> f(x) , g(c(x, s(y))) -> g(c(y, x)) , g(c(s(x), y)) -> g(c(y, x)) } Weak DPs: { id_inc^#(0()) -> c_5() , id_inc^#(0()) -> c_6() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..