MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x , minus(x, 0()) -> x , minus(x, s(y)) -> p(minus(x, y)) , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) , div(0(), s(y)) -> 0() , div(s(x), s(y)) -> s(div(minus(s(x), s(y)), s(y))) , log(s(0()), s(s(y))) -> 0() , log(s(s(x)), s(s(y))) -> s(log(div(minus(x, y), s(s(y))), s(s(y)))) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { p^#(0()) -> c_1() , p^#(s(x)) -> c_2(x) , minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x) , minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(p^#(minus(x, y))) , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(minus^#(x, y)) , div^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() , div^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(div^#(minus(s(x), s(y)), s(y))) , log^#(s(0()), s(s(y))) -> c_8() , log^#(s(s(x)), s(s(y))) -> c_9(log^#(div(minus(x, y), s(s(y))), s(s(y)))) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { p^#(0()) -> c_1() , p^#(s(x)) -> c_2(x) , minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x) , minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(p^#(minus(x, y))) , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(minus^#(x, y)) , div^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() , div^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(div^#(minus(s(x), s(y)), s(y))) , log^#(s(0()), s(s(y))) -> c_8() , log^#(s(s(x)), s(s(y))) -> c_9(log^#(div(minus(x, y), s(s(y))), s(s(y)))) } Strict Trs: { p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x , minus(x, 0()) -> x , minus(x, s(y)) -> p(minus(x, y)) , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) , div(0(), s(y)) -> 0() , div(s(x), s(y)) -> s(div(minus(s(x), s(y)), s(y))) , log(s(0()), s(s(y))) -> 0() , log(s(s(x)), s(s(y))) -> s(log(div(minus(x, y), s(s(y))), s(s(y)))) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {1,6,8} by applications of Pre({1,6,8}) = {2,3,4,7,9}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: p^#(0()) -> c_1() , 2: p^#(s(x)) -> c_2(x) , 3: minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x) , 4: minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(p^#(minus(x, y))) , 5: minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(minus^#(x, y)) , 6: div^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() , 7: div^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(div^#(minus(s(x), s(y)), s(y))) , 8: log^#(s(0()), s(s(y))) -> c_8() , 9: log^#(s(s(x)), s(s(y))) -> c_9(log^#(div(minus(x, y), s(s(y))), s(s(y)))) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { p^#(s(x)) -> c_2(x) , minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_3(x) , minus^#(x, s(y)) -> c_4(p^#(minus(x, y))) , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(minus^#(x, y)) , div^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_7(div^#(minus(s(x), s(y)), s(y))) , log^#(s(s(x)), s(s(y))) -> c_9(log^#(div(minus(x, y), s(s(y))), s(s(y)))) } Strict Trs: { p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x , minus(x, 0()) -> x , minus(x, s(y)) -> p(minus(x, y)) , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) , div(0(), s(y)) -> 0() , div(s(x), s(y)) -> s(div(minus(s(x), s(y)), s(y))) , log(s(0()), s(s(y))) -> 0() , log(s(s(x)), s(s(y))) -> s(log(div(minus(x, y), s(s(y))), s(s(y)))) } Weak DPs: { p^#(0()) -> c_1() , div^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_6() , log^#(s(0()), s(s(y))) -> c_8() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..