MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { cond1(true(), x, y) -> cond2(gr(x, y), x, y) , cond2(true(), x, y) -> cond3(gr(x, 0()), x, y) , cond2(false(), x, y) -> cond4(gr(y, 0()), x, y) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) , cond3(true(), x, y) -> cond3(gr(x, 0()), p(x), y) , cond3(false(), x, y) -> cond1(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y) , cond4(true(), x, y) -> cond4(gr(y, 0()), x, p(y)) , cond4(false(), x, y) -> cond1(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y) , p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x , and(x, false()) -> false() , and(true(), true()) -> true() , and(false(), x) -> false() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { cond1^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond2^#(gr(x, y), x, y)) , cond2^#(true(), x, y) -> c_2(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), x, y)) , cond2^#(false(), x, y) -> c_3(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, y)) , cond3^#(true(), x, y) -> c_7(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), p(x), y)) , cond3^#(false(), x, y) -> c_8(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , cond4^#(true(), x, y) -> c_9(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, p(y))) , cond4^#(false(), x, y) -> c_10(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_4() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_5() , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(gr^#(x, y)) , p^#(0()) -> c_11() , p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) , and^#(x, false()) -> c_13() , and^#(true(), true()) -> c_14() , and^#(false(), x) -> c_15() } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond1^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond2^#(gr(x, y), x, y)) , cond2^#(true(), x, y) -> c_2(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), x, y)) , cond2^#(false(), x, y) -> c_3(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, y)) , cond3^#(true(), x, y) -> c_7(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), p(x), y)) , cond3^#(false(), x, y) -> c_8(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , cond4^#(true(), x, y) -> c_9(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, p(y))) , cond4^#(false(), x, y) -> c_10(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_4() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_5() , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(gr^#(x, y)) , p^#(0()) -> c_11() , p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) , and^#(x, false()) -> c_13() , and^#(true(), true()) -> c_14() , and^#(false(), x) -> c_15() } Strict Trs: { cond1(true(), x, y) -> cond2(gr(x, y), x, y) , cond2(true(), x, y) -> cond3(gr(x, 0()), x, y) , cond2(false(), x, y) -> cond4(gr(y, 0()), x, y) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) , cond3(true(), x, y) -> cond3(gr(x, 0()), p(x), y) , cond3(false(), x, y) -> cond1(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y) , cond4(true(), x, y) -> cond4(gr(y, 0()), x, p(y)) , cond4(false(), x, y) -> cond1(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y) , p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x , and(x, false()) -> false() , and(true(), true()) -> true() , and(false(), x) -> false() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {8,9,11,13,14,15} by applications of Pre({8,9,11,13,14,15}) = {10,12}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: cond1^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond2^#(gr(x, y), x, y)) , 2: cond2^#(true(), x, y) -> c_2(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), x, y)) , 3: cond2^#(false(), x, y) -> c_3(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, y)) , 4: cond3^#(true(), x, y) -> c_7(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), p(x), y)) , 5: cond3^#(false(), x, y) -> c_8(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , 6: cond4^#(true(), x, y) -> c_9(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, p(y))) , 7: cond4^#(false(), x, y) -> c_10(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , 8: gr^#(0(), x) -> c_4() , 9: gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_5() , 10: gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(gr^#(x, y)) , 11: p^#(0()) -> c_11() , 12: p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) , 13: and^#(x, false()) -> c_13() , 14: and^#(true(), true()) -> c_14() , 15: and^#(false(), x) -> c_15() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond1^#(true(), x, y) -> c_1(cond2^#(gr(x, y), x, y)) , cond2^#(true(), x, y) -> c_2(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), x, y)) , cond2^#(false(), x, y) -> c_3(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, y)) , cond3^#(true(), x, y) -> c_7(cond3^#(gr(x, 0()), p(x), y)) , cond3^#(false(), x, y) -> c_8(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , cond4^#(true(), x, y) -> c_9(cond4^#(gr(y, 0()), x, p(y))) , cond4^#(false(), x, y) -> c_10(cond1^#(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y)) , gr^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_6(gr^#(x, y)) , p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) } Strict Trs: { cond1(true(), x, y) -> cond2(gr(x, y), x, y) , cond2(true(), x, y) -> cond3(gr(x, 0()), x, y) , cond2(false(), x, y) -> cond4(gr(y, 0()), x, y) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y)) -> gr(x, y) , cond3(true(), x, y) -> cond3(gr(x, 0()), p(x), y) , cond3(false(), x, y) -> cond1(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y) , cond4(true(), x, y) -> cond4(gr(y, 0()), x, p(y)) , cond4(false(), x, y) -> cond1(and(gr(x, 0()), gr(y, 0())), x, y) , p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x , and(x, false()) -> false() , and(true(), true()) -> true() , and(false(), x) -> false() } Weak DPs: { gr^#(0(), x) -> c_4() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_5() , p^#(0()) -> c_11() , and^#(x, false()) -> c_13() , and^#(true(), true()) -> c_14() , and^#(false(), x) -> c_15() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..