MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { qsort(nil()) -> nil() , qsort(.(x, y)) -> ++(qsort(lowers(x, y)), .(x, qsort(greaters(x, y)))) , lowers(x, nil()) -> nil() , lowers(x, .(y, z)) -> if(<=(y, x), .(y, lowers(x, z)), lowers(x, z)) , greaters(x, nil()) -> nil() , greaters(x, .(y, z)) -> if(<=(y, x), greaters(x, z), .(y, greaters(x, z))) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { qsort^#(nil()) -> c_1() , qsort^#(.(x, y)) -> c_2(qsort^#(lowers(x, y)), x, qsort^#(greaters(x, y))) , lowers^#(x, nil()) -> c_3() , lowers^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_4(y, x, y, lowers^#(x, z), lowers^#(x, z)) , greaters^#(x, nil()) -> c_5() , greaters^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_6(y, x, greaters^#(x, z), y, greaters^#(x, z)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { qsort^#(nil()) -> c_1() , qsort^#(.(x, y)) -> c_2(qsort^#(lowers(x, y)), x, qsort^#(greaters(x, y))) , lowers^#(x, nil()) -> c_3() , lowers^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_4(y, x, y, lowers^#(x, z), lowers^#(x, z)) , greaters^#(x, nil()) -> c_5() , greaters^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_6(y, x, greaters^#(x, z), y, greaters^#(x, z)) } Strict Trs: { qsort(nil()) -> nil() , qsort(.(x, y)) -> ++(qsort(lowers(x, y)), .(x, qsort(greaters(x, y)))) , lowers(x, nil()) -> nil() , lowers(x, .(y, z)) -> if(<=(y, x), .(y, lowers(x, z)), lowers(x, z)) , greaters(x, nil()) -> nil() , greaters(x, .(y, z)) -> if(<=(y, x), greaters(x, z), .(y, greaters(x, z))) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {1,3,5} by applications of Pre({1,3,5}) = {2,4,6}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: qsort^#(nil()) -> c_1() , 2: qsort^#(.(x, y)) -> c_2(qsort^#(lowers(x, y)), x, qsort^#(greaters(x, y))) , 3: lowers^#(x, nil()) -> c_3() , 4: lowers^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_4(y, x, y, lowers^#(x, z), lowers^#(x, z)) , 5: greaters^#(x, nil()) -> c_5() , 6: greaters^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_6(y, x, greaters^#(x, z), y, greaters^#(x, z)) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { qsort^#(.(x, y)) -> c_2(qsort^#(lowers(x, y)), x, qsort^#(greaters(x, y))) , lowers^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_4(y, x, y, lowers^#(x, z), lowers^#(x, z)) , greaters^#(x, .(y, z)) -> c_6(y, x, greaters^#(x, z), y, greaters^#(x, z)) } Strict Trs: { qsort(nil()) -> nil() , qsort(.(x, y)) -> ++(qsort(lowers(x, y)), .(x, qsort(greaters(x, y)))) , lowers(x, nil()) -> nil() , lowers(x, .(y, z)) -> if(<=(y, x), .(y, lowers(x, z)), lowers(x, z)) , greaters(x, nil()) -> nil() , greaters(x, .(y, z)) -> if(<=(y, x), greaters(x, z), .(y, greaters(x, z))) } Weak DPs: { qsort^#(nil()) -> c_1() , lowers^#(x, nil()) -> c_3() , greaters^#(x, nil()) -> c_5() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..