MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { f(s(a()), s(b()), x) -> f(x, x, x) , g(f(s(x), s(y), z)) -> g(f(x, y, z)) , cons(x, y) -> x , cons(x, y) -> y } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { f^#(s(a()), s(b()), x) -> c_1(f^#(x, x, x)) , g^#(f(s(x), s(y), z)) -> c_2(g^#(f(x, y, z))) , cons^#(x, y) -> c_3(x) , cons^#(x, y) -> c_4(y) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(s(a()), s(b()), x) -> c_1(f^#(x, x, x)) , g^#(f(s(x), s(y), z)) -> c_2(g^#(f(x, y, z))) , cons^#(x, y) -> c_3(x) , cons^#(x, y) -> c_4(y) } Strict Trs: { f(s(a()), s(b()), x) -> f(x, x, x) , g(f(s(x), s(y), z)) -> g(f(x, y, z)) , cons(x, y) -> x , cons(x, y) -> y } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..