MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { f(0(), 1(), x) -> f(h(x), h(x), x) , h(0()) -> 0() , h(g(x, y)) -> y } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'WithProblem' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'WithProblem' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'WithProblem' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'WithProblem' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'WithProblem' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'WithProblem' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { f^#(0(), 1(), x) -> c_1(f^#(h(x), h(x), x)) , h^#(0()) -> c_2() , h^#(g(x, y)) -> c_3(y) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(0(), 1(), x) -> c_1(f^#(h(x), h(x), x)) , h^#(0()) -> c_2() , h^#(g(x, y)) -> c_3(y) } Strict Trs: { f(0(), 1(), x) -> f(h(x), h(x), x) , h(0()) -> 0() , h(g(x, y)) -> y } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {2} by applications of Pre({2}) = {3}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: f^#(0(), 1(), x) -> c_1(f^#(h(x), h(x), x)) , 2: h^#(0()) -> c_2() , 3: h^#(g(x, y)) -> c_3(y) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { f^#(0(), 1(), x) -> c_1(f^#(h(x), h(x), x)) , h^#(g(x, y)) -> c_3(y) } Strict Trs: { f(0(), 1(), x) -> f(h(x), h(x), x) , h(0()) -> 0() , h(g(x, y)) -> y } Weak DPs: { h^#(0()) -> c_2() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..