by T2Cert
| 0 | 0 | 1: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ R_post ≤ 0 ∧ − R_post ≤ 0 ∧ A_post − R_post ≤ 0 ∧ − A_post + R_post ≤ 0 ∧ A_0 − A_post ≤ 0 ∧ − A_0 + A_post ≤ 0 ∧ NBuffers_0 − NBuffers_post ≤ 0 ∧ − NBuffers_0 + NBuffers_post ≤ 0 ∧ NLocBuffer_0 − NLocBuffer_post ≤ 0 ∧ − NLocBuffer_0 + NLocBuffer_post ≤ 0 ∧ R_0 − R_post ≤ 0 ∧ − R_0 + R_post ≤ 0 ∧ istemp_0 − istemp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − istemp_0 + istemp_post ≤ 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0: | − istemp_post + istemp_post ≤ 0 ∧ istemp_post − istemp_post ≤ 0 ∧ − istemp_0 + istemp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ istemp_0 − istemp_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − R_post + R_post ≤ 0 ∧ R_post − R_post ≤ 0 ∧ − R_0 + R_0 ≤ 0 ∧ R_0 − R_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − NLocBuffer_post + NLocBuffer_post ≤ 0 ∧ NLocBuffer_post − NLocBuffer_post ≤ 0 ∧ − NLocBuffer_0 + NLocBuffer_0 ≤ 0 ∧ NLocBuffer_0 − NLocBuffer_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − NBuffers_post + NBuffers_post ≤ 0 ∧ NBuffers_post − NBuffers_post ≤ 0 ∧ − NBuffers_0 + NBuffers_0 ≤ 0 ∧ NBuffers_0 − NBuffers_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − A_post + A_post ≤ 0 ∧ A_post − A_post ≤ 0 ∧ − A_0 + A_0 ≤ 0 ∧ A_0 − A_0 ≤ 0 | 
The following invariants are asserted.
| 0: | TRUE | 
| 1: | A_post ≤ 0 ∧ R_post ≤ 0 ∧ − R_post ≤ 0 ∧ A_0 ≤ 0 ∧ R_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − R_0 ≤ 0 | 
| 2: | TRUE | 
The invariants are proved as follows.
| 0 | (0) | TRUE | ||
| 1 | (1) | A_post ≤ 0 ∧ R_post ≤ 0 ∧ − R_post ≤ 0 ∧ A_0 ≤ 0 ∧ R_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − R_0 ≤ 0 | ||
| 2 | (2) | TRUE | 
| 0 | 0 1 | |
| 2 | 1 0 | 
We remove transitions , using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −8.
| 2: | 0 | 
| 0: | 0 | 
| 1: | 0 | 
| : | −4 | 
| : | −5 | 
| : | −6 | 
| lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | |
| lexStrict[ [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] , [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] ] | 
There exist no SCC in the program graph.
T2Cert