by T2Cert
| 0 | 0 | 1: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − x_0 + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + x_0 − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_post ≤ 0 | |
| 1 | 1 | 2: | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0 | |
| 1 | 2 | 2: | 1 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | 0: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | 0: | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | 3: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0 |
| 0 | 6 | : | − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0 |
We remove transitions , using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −11.
| 4: | 0 |
| 3: | 0 |
| 0: | 0 |
| 1: | 0 |
| 2: | 0 |
| : | −4 |
| : | −5 |
| : | −6 |
| : | −6 |
| : | −6 |
| : | −6 |
| : | −6 |
The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.
9 : − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0
The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.
7 : − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0
We consider subproblems for each of the 1 SCC(s) of the program graph.
Here we consider the SCC { , , , , }.
We remove transition using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 5.
| : | −2 + 5⋅x_0 |
| : | 1 + 5⋅x_0 |
| : | 5⋅x_0 |
| : | −3 + 5⋅x_0 |
| : | −1 + 5⋅x_0 |
We consider 1 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.
The following invariants are asserted.
| 0: | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 |
| 1: | − x_0 ≤ 0 |
| 2: | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ 0 |
| 3: | TRUE |
| 4: | TRUE |
| : | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 |
| : | − x_0 ≤ 0 |
| : | 1 ≤ 0 |
| : | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 |
| : | 1 ≤ 0 |
The invariants are proved as follows.
| 0 | (4) | TRUE | ||
| 1 | (3) | TRUE | ||
| 2 | (0) | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 | ||
| 3 | (1) | − x_0 ≤ 0 | ||
| 4 | () | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 | ||
| 5 | () | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 | ||
| 10 | (2) | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 | ||
| 11 | (2) | 1 ≤ 0 | ||
| 17 | () | − x_0 ≤ 0 | ||
| 18 | () | 1 ≤ 0 | ||
| 26 | (0) | 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 |
| 26 | → 2 |
| 0 | 5 1 | |
| 1 | 4 2 | |
| 2 | 0 3 | |
| 2 | 6 4 | |
| 3 | 1 10 | |
| 3 | 2 11 | |
| 4 | 7 5 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 10 | 3 26 | |
| 17 | 18 |
We remove transition 7 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −7.
| : | −1 |
| : | −2 |
| : | −3 |
| : | −4 |
| : | −5 |
There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.
T2Cert