ceta_eq: termination proof not accepted 1: error below switch to dependency pairs 1.1: error below the dependency graph processor 1.1.5: error when applying the reduction pair processor with usable rules to remove from the DP problem pairs: plus#(mark(X1), X2) -> plus#(X1, X2) plus#(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus#(X1, X2) plus#(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> plus#(X1, X2) rules: active(and(tt, X)) -> mark(X) active(plus(N, 0)) -> mark(N) active(plus(N, s(M))) -> mark(s(plus(N, M))) active(x(N, 0)) -> mark(0) active(x(N, s(M))) -> mark(plus(x(N, M), N)) active(and(X1, X2)) -> and(active(X1), X2) active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(active(X1), X2) active(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(X1, active(X2)) active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(active(X1), X2) active(x(X1, X2)) -> x(X1, active(X2)) and(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(and(X1, X2)) and(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(and(X1, X2)) plus(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) plus(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(plus(X1, X2)) plus(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(plus(X1, X2)) proper(and(X1, X2)) -> and(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(tt) -> ok(tt) proper(plus(X1, X2)) -> plus(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(0) -> ok(0) proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) proper(x(X1, X2)) -> x(proper(X1), proper(X2)) s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) x(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) x(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(x(X1, X2)) x(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(x(X1, X2)) the pairs plus#(mark(X1), X2) -> plus#(X1, X2) plus#(X1, mark(X2)) -> plus#(X1, X2) could not apply the generic root reduction pair processor with the following SCNP-version with mu = MS and the level mapping defined by pi(plus#) = [(1,0),(2,2)] Argument Filter: pi(plus#/2) = [] pi(mark/1) = [1] pi(ok/1) = 1 RPO with the following precedence precedence(plus#[2]) = 0 precedence(mark[1]) = 1 precedence(_) = 0 and the following status status(plus#[2]) = lex status(mark[1]) = lex status(_) = lex problem when orienting DPs cannot orient pair plus#(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> plus#(X1, X2) weakly: [(ok(X1),0),(ok(X2),2)] >=mu [(X1,0),(X2,2)] could not be ensured