ceta_eq: termination proof not accepted 1: error below switch to dependency pairs 1.1: error below the dependency graph processor 1.1.1: error when applying the reduction pair processor with usable rules to remove from the DP problem pairs: 2ndspos#(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos#(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z))) 2ndspos#(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2ndsneg#(N, activate(Z)) 2ndsneg#(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg#(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z))) 2ndsneg#(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2ndspos#(N, activate(Z)) rules: 2ndsneg(0, Z) -> rnil 2ndsneg(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z))) 2ndsneg(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(negrecip(Y), 2ndspos(N, activate(Z))) 2ndspos(0, Z) -> rnil 2ndspos(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z))) 2ndspos(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> rcons(posrecip(Y), 2ndsneg(N, activate(Z))) activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) activate(X) -> X from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(s(X))) from(X) -> n__from(X) pi(X) -> 2ndspos(X, from(0)) plus(0, Y) -> Y plus(s(X), Y) -> s(plus(X, Y)) square(X) -> times(X, X) times(0, Y) -> 0 times(s(X), Y) -> plus(Y, times(X, Y)) the pairs 2ndspos#(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2ndsneg#(N, activate(Z)) 2ndsneg#(s(N), cons2(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> 2ndspos#(N, activate(Z)) could not apply the generic root reduction pair processor with the following SCNP-version with mu = MS and the level mapping defined by pi(2ndspos#) = [(epsilon,0),(1,5)] pi(2ndsneg#) = [(epsilon,0),(1,2)] Argument Filter: pi(2ndspos#/2) = [] pi(s/1) = [1] pi(cons2/2) = [1] pi(cons/2) = 2 pi(2ndsneg#/2) = [] pi(activate/1) = [] pi(n__from/1) = [1] pi(from/1) = [1] RPO with the following precedence precedence(2ndspos#[2]) = 3 precedence(s[1]) = 3 precedence(cons2[2]) = 0 precedence(2ndsneg#[2]) = 3 precedence(activate[1]) = 3 precedence(n__from[1]) = 1 precedence(from[1]) = 2 precedence(_) = 0 and the following status status(2ndspos#[2]) = lex status(s[1]) = lex status(cons2[2]) = lex status(2ndsneg#[2]) = lex status(activate[1]) = lex status(n__from[1]) = lex status(from[1]) = lex status(_) = lex problem when orienting DPs cannot orient pair 2ndspos#(s(N), cons(X, Z)) -> 2ndspos#(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z))) weakly: [(2ndspos#(s(N), cons(X, Z)),0),(s(N),5)] >=mu [(2ndspos#(s(N), cons2(X, activate(Z))),0),(s(N),5)] could not be ensured