ceta_equiv: termination proof not accepted 1: error below switch to dependency pairs 1.1: error below the dependency graph processor 1.1.2: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.2.1: error when applying the reduction pair processor with usable rules to remove from the DP problem pairs: eq#(cons(t, l), cons(t', l')) -> eq#(t, t') eq#(cons(t, l), cons(t', l')) -> eq#(l, l') eq#(apply(t, s), apply(t', s')) -> eq#(t, t') eq#(apply(t, s), apply(t', s')) -> eq#(s, s') eq#(lambda(x, t), lambda(x', t')) -> eq#(x, x') eq#(lambda(x, t), lambda(x', t')) -> eq#(t, t') rules: and(true, y) -> y and(false, y) -> false eq(nil, nil) -> true eq(cons(t, l), nil) -> false eq(nil, cons(t, l)) -> false eq(cons(t, l), cons(t', l')) -> and(eq(t, t'), eq(l, l')) eq(var(l), var(l')) -> eq(l, l') eq(var(l), apply(t, s)) -> false eq(var(l), lambda(x, t)) -> false eq(apply(t, s), var(l)) -> false eq(apply(t, s), apply(t', s')) -> and(eq(t, t'), eq(s, s')) eq(apply(t, s), lambda(x, t)) -> false eq(lambda(x, t), var(l)) -> false eq(lambda(x, t), apply(t, s)) -> false eq(lambda(x, t), lambda(x', t')) -> and(eq(x, x'), eq(t, t')) if(true, var(k), var(l')) -> var(k) if(false, var(k), var(l')) -> var(l') ren(var(l), var(k), var(l')) -> if(eq(l, l'), var(k), var(l')) ren(x, y, apply(t, s)) -> apply(ren(x, y, t), ren(x, y, s)) ren(x, y, lambda(z, t)) -> lambda(var(cons(x, cons(y, cons(lambda(z, t), nil)))), ren(x, y, ren(z, var(cons(x, cons(y, cons(lambda(z, t), nil)))), t))) the pairs eq#(apply(t, s), apply(t', s')) -> eq#(t, t') eq#(apply(t, s), apply(t', s')) -> eq#(s, s') could not apply the generic root reduction pair processor with the following SCNP-version with mu = MS and the level mapping defined by pi(eq#) = [(epsilon,0),(1,0)] polynomial interpretration over naturals with negative constants Pol(eq#(x_1, x_2)) = 1 Pol(cons(x_1, x_2)) = x_2 + x_1 Pol(apply(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_2 + x_1 Pol(lambda(x_1, x_2)) = x_2 + x_1 problem when orienting DPs cannot orient pair eq#(cons(t, l), cons(t', l')) -> eq#(t, t') weakly: [(eq#(cons(t, l), cons(t', l')),0),(cons(t, l),0)] >=mu [(eq#(t, t'),0),(t,0)] could not be ensured