ceta_equiv: termination proof not accepted 1: error below switch to dependency pairs 1.1: error below the dependency graph processor 1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1: error below the reduction pair processor 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1: error when applying the reduction pair processor to remove from the DP problem pairs: active#(if(false, X, Y)) -> mark#(Y) mark#(and(X1, X2)) -> active#(and(mark(X1), X2)) mark#(if(X1, X2, X3)) -> active#(if(mark(X1), X2, X3)) mark#(if(X1, X2, X3)) -> mark#(X1) mark#(add(X1, X2)) -> active#(add(mark(X1), X2)) mark#(first(X1, X2)) -> active#(first(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark#(cons(X1, X2)) -> active#(cons(X1, X2)) mark#(from(X)) -> active#(from(X)) rules: active(and(true, X)) -> mark(X) active(and(false, Y)) -> mark(false) active(if(true, X, Y)) -> mark(X) active(if(false, X, Y)) -> mark(Y) active(add(0, X)) -> mark(X) active(add(s(X), Y)) -> mark(s(add(X, Y))) active(first(0, X)) -> mark(nil) active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z))) active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X)))) add(mark(X1), X2) -> add(X1, X2) add(X1, mark(X2)) -> add(X1, X2) add(active(X1), X2) -> add(X1, X2) add(X1, active(X2)) -> add(X1, X2) and(mark(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, mark(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) and(active(X1), X2) -> and(X1, X2) and(X1, active(X2)) -> and(X1, X2) cons(mark(X1), X2) -> cons(X1, X2) cons(X1, mark(X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) cons(active(X1), X2) -> cons(X1, X2) cons(X1, active(X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) first(mark(X1), X2) -> first(X1, X2) first(X1, mark(X2)) -> first(X1, X2) first(active(X1), X2) -> first(X1, X2) first(X1, active(X2)) -> first(X1, X2) from(mark(X)) -> from(X) from(active(X)) -> from(X) if(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> if(X1, X2, X3) if(X1, mark(X2), X3) -> if(X1, X2, X3) if(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> if(X1, X2, X3) if(active(X1), X2, X3) -> if(X1, X2, X3) if(X1, active(X2), X3) -> if(X1, X2, X3) if(X1, X2, active(X3)) -> if(X1, X2, X3) mark(and(X1, X2)) -> active(and(mark(X1), X2)) mark(true) -> active(true) mark(false) -> active(false) mark(if(X1, X2, X3)) -> active(if(mark(X1), X2, X3)) mark(add(X1, X2)) -> active(add(mark(X1), X2)) mark(0) -> active(0) mark(s(X)) -> active(s(X)) mark(first(X1, X2)) -> active(first(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark(nil) -> active(nil) mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> active(cons(X1, X2)) mark(from(X)) -> active(from(X)) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) s(active(X)) -> s(X) the pairs active#(if(false, X, Y)) -> mark#(Y) could not apply the generic root reduction pair processor with the following SCNP-version with mu = MS and the level mapping defined by pi(mark#) = [(epsilon,0),(1,0)] pi(active#) = [(epsilon,0),(1,0)] polynomial interpretration over naturals with negative constants Pol(mark#(x_1)) = 1 Pol(and(x_1, x_2)) = x_2 + x_1 Pol(active#(x_1)) = 1 Pol(mark(x_1)) = x_1 Pol(if(x_1, x_2, x_3)) = x_3 + x_2 + x_1 Pol(add(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_2 + x_1 Pol(false) = 1 Pol(first(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_2 + x_1 Pol(cons(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 Pol(from(x_1)) = x_1 Pol(active(x_1)) = x_1 Pol(true) = 1 Pol(s(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 Pol(0) = 0 Pol(nil) = 0 problem when orienting DPs cannot orient pair mark#(if(X1, X2, X3)) -> mark#(X1) weakly: [(mark#(if(X1, X2, X3)),0),(if(X1, X2, X3),0)] >=mu [(mark#(X1),0),(X1,0)] could not be ensured