ceta_equiv: termination proof not accepted 1: error below switch to dependency pairs 1.1: error below the dependency graph processor 1.1.1: error when applying the reduction pair processor to remove from the DP problem pairs: active#(app(nil, YS)) -> mark#(YS) active#(app(cons(X, XS), YS)) -> mark#(cons(X, app(XS, YS))) active#(from(X)) -> mark#(cons(X, from(s(X)))) active#(zWadr(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) -> mark#(cons(app(Y, cons(X, nil)), zWadr(XS, YS))) active#(prefix(L)) -> mark#(cons(nil, zWadr(L, prefix(L)))) mark#(app(X1, X2)) -> active#(app(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark#(app(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X1) mark#(app(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X2) mark#(cons(X1, X2)) -> active#(cons(mark(X1), X2)) mark#(cons(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X1) mark#(from(X)) -> active#(from(mark(X))) mark#(from(X)) -> mark#(X) mark#(s(X)) -> active#(s(mark(X))) mark#(s(X)) -> mark#(X) mark#(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> active#(zWadr(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark#(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X1) mark#(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X2) mark#(prefix(X)) -> active#(prefix(mark(X))) mark#(prefix(X)) -> mark#(X) rules: active(app(nil, YS)) -> mark(YS) active(app(cons(X, XS), YS)) -> mark(cons(X, app(XS, YS))) active(from(X)) -> mark(cons(X, from(s(X)))) active(zWadr(nil, YS)) -> mark(nil) active(zWadr(XS, nil)) -> mark(nil) active(zWadr(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) -> mark(cons(app(Y, cons(X, nil)), zWadr(XS, YS))) active(prefix(L)) -> mark(cons(nil, zWadr(L, prefix(L)))) app(mark(X1), X2) -> app(X1, X2) app(X1, mark(X2)) -> app(X1, X2) app(active(X1), X2) -> app(X1, X2) app(X1, active(X2)) -> app(X1, X2) cons(mark(X1), X2) -> cons(X1, X2) cons(X1, mark(X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) cons(active(X1), X2) -> cons(X1, X2) cons(X1, active(X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) from(mark(X)) -> from(X) from(active(X)) -> from(X) mark(app(X1, X2)) -> active(app(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark(nil) -> active(nil) mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> active(cons(mark(X1), X2)) mark(from(X)) -> active(from(mark(X))) mark(s(X)) -> active(s(mark(X))) mark(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> active(zWadr(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark(prefix(X)) -> active(prefix(mark(X))) prefix(mark(X)) -> prefix(X) prefix(active(X)) -> prefix(X) s(mark(X)) -> s(X) s(active(X)) -> s(X) zWadr(mark(X1), X2) -> zWadr(X1, X2) zWadr(X1, mark(X2)) -> zWadr(X1, X2) zWadr(active(X1), X2) -> zWadr(X1, X2) zWadr(X1, active(X2)) -> zWadr(X1, X2) the pairs active#(app(nil, YS)) -> mark#(YS) active#(app(cons(X, XS), YS)) -> mark#(cons(X, app(XS, YS))) active#(from(X)) -> mark#(cons(X, from(s(X)))) active#(zWadr(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) -> mark#(cons(app(Y, cons(X, nil)), zWadr(XS, YS))) active#(prefix(L)) -> mark#(cons(nil, zWadr(L, prefix(L)))) mark#(app(X1, X2)) -> active#(app(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark#(app(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X1) mark#(app(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X2) mark#(cons(X1, X2)) -> active#(cons(mark(X1), X2)) mark#(from(X)) -> active#(from(mark(X))) mark#(from(X)) -> mark#(X) mark#(s(X)) -> active#(s(mark(X))) mark#(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> active#(zWadr(mark(X1), mark(X2))) mark#(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X1) mark#(zWadr(X1, X2)) -> mark#(X2) mark#(prefix(X)) -> active#(prefix(mark(X))) mark#(prefix(X)) -> mark#(X) could not apply the generic root reduction pair processor with the following SCNP-version with mu = MAX and the level mapping defined by pi(mark#) = [(epsilon,0)] pi(active#) = [(1,3)] Argument Filter: pi(mark#/1) = [1] pi(app/2) = [1,2] pi(active#/1) = [] pi(mark/1) = 1 pi(nil/0) = [] pi(cons/2) = 1 pi(from/1) = [1] pi(s/1) = 1 pi(zWadr/2) = [1,2] pi(prefix/1) = [1] pi(active/1) = 1 RPO with the following precedence precedence(mark#[1]) = 0 precedence(app[2]) = 1 precedence(active#[1]) = 3 precedence(nil[0]) = 0 precedence(from[1]) = 0 precedence(zWadr[2]) = 2 precedence(prefix[1]) = 0 precedence(_) = 0 and the following status status(mark#[1]) = mul status(app[2]) = mul status(active#[1]) = mul status(nil[0]) = mul status(from[1]) = mul status(zWadr[2]) = mul status(prefix[1]) = mul status(_) = lex problem when orienting DPs cannot orient pair active#(prefix(L)) -> mark#(cons(nil, zWadr(L, prefix(L)))) strictly: [(prefix(L),3)] >mu [(mark#(cons(nil, zWadr(L, prefix(L)))),0)] could not be ensured