4.39/1.58 YES 4.39/1.58 4.39/1.58 Problem: 4.39/1.58 a() -> c() 4.39/1.58 a() -> d() 4.39/1.58 b() -> c() 4.39/1.58 b() -> d() 4.39/1.58 c() -> e() 4.39/1.58 d() -> e() 4.39/1.58 k() -> e() 4.39/1.58 l() -> e() 4.39/1.58 s(c()) -> t(k()) 4.39/1.58 s(c()) -> t(l()) 4.39/1.58 s(e()) -> t(e()) 4.39/1.58 g(x, x) -> h(x, x) 4.39/1.58 f(x) -> pair(x, y) <= s(x) = t(y) 4.39/1.58 4.39/1.58 Proof: 4.39/1.58 This system is confluent. 4.39/1.58 By \cite{ALS94}, Theorem 4.1. 4.39/1.58 This system is of type 3 or smaller. 4.39/1.58 This system is strongly deterministic. 4.39/1.58 All 8 critical pairs are joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: c() = d(): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: t(l()) = t(k()): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: d() = c(): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: t(k()) = t(l()): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: s(e()) = t(k()): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: d() = c(): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: c() = d(): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 CP: s(e()) = t(l()): 4.39/1.58 This critical pair is context-joinable. 4.39/1.58 This system is quasi-decreasing. 4.39/1.58 By \cite{A14}, Theorem 11.5.9. 4.39/1.58 This system is of type 3 or smaller. 4.39/1.58 This system is deterministic. 4.39/1.58 System R transformed to V(R) + Emb. 4.39/1.58 This system is terminating. 4.39/1.58 Call external tool: 4.39/1.58 ./ttt2.sh 4.39/1.58 Input: 4.39/1.58 a() -> c() 4.39/1.58 a() -> d() 4.39/1.58 b() -> c() 4.39/1.58 b() -> d() 4.39/1.58 c() -> e() 4.39/1.58 d() -> e() 4.39/1.58 k() -> e() 4.39/1.58 l() -> e() 4.39/1.58 s(c()) -> t(k()) 4.39/1.58 s(c()) -> t(l()) 4.39/1.58 s(e()) -> t(e()) 4.39/1.58 g(x, x) -> h(x, x) 4.39/1.58 f(x) -> pair(x, s(x)) 4.39/1.58 f(x) -> s(x) 4.39/1.58 h(x, y) -> x 4.39/1.58 h(x, y) -> y 4.39/1.58 pair(x, y) -> x 4.39/1.58 pair(x, y) -> y 4.39/1.58 s(x) -> x 4.39/1.58 g(x, y) -> x 4.39/1.58 g(x, y) -> y 4.39/1.58 t(x) -> x 4.39/1.58 f(x) -> x 4.39/1.58 4.39/1.58 Polynomial Interpretation Processor: 4.39/1.58 dimension: 1 4.39/1.58 interpretation: 4.39/1.58 [pair](x0, x1) = 2x0 + x1 + x0x0 + 1, 4.39/1.58 4.39/1.58 [f](x0) = 6x0 + 3x0x0 + 5, 4.39/1.58 4.39/1.59 [h](x0, x1) = x0 + 2x1 + x0x0 + 2x1x1 + 1, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [g](x0, x1) = 4x0 + 4x1 + 2x0x0 + 2x1x1 + 4, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [t](x0) = x0 + 7, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [s](x0) = 4x0 + 2x0x0 + 1, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [l] = 4, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [k] = 3, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [e] = 2, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [b] = 5, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [d] = 4, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [c] = 3, 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 [a] = 5 4.39/1.59 orientation: 4.39/1.59 a() = 5 >= 3 = c() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 a() = 5 >= 4 = d() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 b() = 5 >= 3 = c() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 b() = 5 >= 4 = d() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 c() = 3 >= 2 = e() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 d() = 4 >= 2 = e() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 k() = 3 >= 2 = e() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 l() = 4 >= 2 = e() 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 s(c()) = 31 >= 10 = t(k()) 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 s(c()) = 31 >= 11 = t(l()) 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 s(e()) = 17 >= 9 = t(e()) 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 g(x,x) = 8x + 4x*x + 4 >= 3x + 3x*x + 1 = h(x,x) 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 f(x) = 6x + 3x*x + 5 >= 6x + 3x*x + 2 = pair(x,s(x)) 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 f(x) = 6x + 3x*x + 5 >= 4x + 2x*x + 1 = s(x) 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 h(x,y) = x + x*x + 2y + 2y*y + 1 >= x = x 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 h(x,y) = x + x*x + 2y + 2y*y + 1 >= y = y 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 pair(x,y) = 2x + x*x + y + 1 >= x = x 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 pair(x,y) = 2x + x*x + y + 1 >= y = y 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 s(x) = 4x + 2x*x + 1 >= x = x 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 g(x,y) = 4x + 2x*x + 4y + 2y*y + 4 >= x = x 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 g(x,y) = 4x + 2x*x + 4y + 2y*y + 4 >= y = y 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 t(x) = x + 7 >= x = x 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 f(x) = 6x + 3x*x + 5 >= x = x 4.39/1.59 problem: 4.39/1.59 4.39/1.59 Qed 4.39/1.59 5.21/1.73 EOF