Problem: f(x,x) -> a() c() -> h(c(),g(c())) h(g3(x),g1(g2(x))) -> f(x,h(x,g(x))) Proof: Church Rosser Transformation Processor (to relative problem): strict: f(x,x) -> a() c() -> h(c(),g(c())) h(g3(x),g1(g2(x))) -> f(x,h(x,g(x))) weak: original problem: f(x,x) -> a() c() -> h(c(),g(c())) h(g3(x),g1(g2(x))) -> f(x,h(x,g(x))) critical peaks: Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [g1](x0) = 2x0 + 6, [g2](x0) = 4x0 + 1, [g3](x0) = 2x0 + 3, [h](x0, x1) = 2x0 + x1, [g](x0) = 4x0, [c] = 0, [a] = 0, [f](x0, x1) = 2x0 + x1 orientation: f(x,x) = 3x >= 0 = a() c() = 0 >= 0 = h(c(),g(c())) h(g3(x),g1(g2(x))) = 12x + 14 >= 8x = f(x,h(x,g(x))) problem: strict: f(x,x) -> a() c() -> h(c(),g(c())) weak: original problem: f(x,x) -> a() c() -> h(c(),g(c())) h(g3(x),g1(g2(x))) -> f(x,h(x,g(x))) Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [h](x0, x1) = x0 + x1, [g](x0) = 2x0, [c] = 0, [a] = 0, [f](x0, x1) = 6x0 + x1 + 2 orientation: f(x,x) = 7x + 2 >= 0 = a() c() = 0 >= 0 = h(c(),g(c())) problem: strict: c() -> h(c(),g(c())) weak: original problem: f(x,x) -> a() c() -> h(c(),g(c())) h(g3(x),g1(g2(x))) -> f(x,h(x,g(x))) KH confluence processor Split input TRS into two TRSs S and T: TRS S: c() -> h(c(),g(c())) TRS T: f(x,x) -> a() h(g3(x),g1(g2(x))) -> f(x,h(x,g(x))) As established above, T/S is terminating. T is strongly non-overlapping on S and S is strongly non-overlapping on T Please install theorem prover 'Prover9' and 'Mace4' for handling more TRSs. All S-critical pairs are joinable. We have to check confluence of S. Church Rosser Transformation Processor (no redundant rules): strict: c() -> h(c(),g(c())) weak: critical peaks: 0 Closedness Processor (*feeble*): Qed