Certification Problem

Input (COPS 158)

We consider the TRS containing the following rules:

+(0,y) y (1)
+(x,0) x (2)
+(s(x),y) s(+(x,y)) (3)
+(x,s(y)) s(+(x,y)) (4)
+(x,y) +(y,x) (5)

The underlying signature is as follows:

{+/2, 0/0, s/1}

Property / Task

Prove or disprove confluence.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by ACP @ CoCo 2023)

1 Development Closed

Confluence is proven since the TRS is development closed. The joins can be performed using 1 development step(s).