WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x,h1(y,z)) -> h2(0(),x,h1(y,z)) f(j(x,y),y) -> g(f(x,k(y))) g(h2(x,y,h1(z,u))) -> h2(s(x),y,h1(z,u)) h2(x,j(y,h1(z,u)),h1(z,u)) -> h2(s(x),y,h1(s(z),u)) i(f(x,h(y))) -> y i(h2(s(x),y,h1(x,z))) -> z k(h(x)) -> h1(0(),x) k(h1(x,y)) -> h1(s(x),y) - Signature: {f/2,g/1,h2/3,i/1,k/1} / {0/0,h/1,h1/2,j/2,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g,h2,i,k} and constructors {0,h,h1,j,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(f) = {2}, uargs(g) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {f,g,h2,i,k} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = [0] p(f) = [4] x1 + [1] x2 + [7] p(g) = [1] x1 + [6] p(h) = [1] x1 + [0] p(h1) = [1] x2 + [0] p(h2) = [2] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] x3 + [0] p(i) = [1] x1 + [2] p(j) = [1] x1 + [6] p(k) = [1] x1 + [4] p(s) = [1] x1 + [1] Following rules are strictly oriented: f(x,h1(y,z)) = [4] x + [1] z + [7] > [1] x + [1] z + [0] = h2(0(),x,h1(y,z)) f(j(x,y),y) = [4] x + [1] y + [31] > [4] x + [1] y + [17] = g(f(x,k(y))) g(h2(x,y,h1(z,u))) = [1] u + [2] x + [1] y + [6] > [1] u + [2] x + [1] y + [2] = h2(s(x),y,h1(z,u)) h2(x,j(y,h1(z,u)),h1(z,u)) = [1] u + [2] x + [1] y + [6] > [1] u + [2] x + [1] y + [2] = h2(s(x),y,h1(s(z),u)) i(f(x,h(y))) = [4] x + [1] y + [9] > [1] y + [0] = y i(h2(s(x),y,h1(x,z))) = [2] x + [1] y + [1] z + [4] > [1] z + [0] = z k(h(x)) = [1] x + [4] > [1] x + [0] = h1(0(),x) k(h1(x,y)) = [1] y + [4] > [1] y + [0] = h1(s(x),y) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))