WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a() -> n__a() activate(X) -> X activate(n__a()) -> a() activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) activate(n__g(X)) -> g(activate(X)) f(X) -> n__f(X) f(f(a())) -> c(n__f(n__g(n__f(n__a())))) g(X) -> n__g(X) - Signature: {a/0,activate/1,f/1,g/1} / {c/1,n__a/0,n__f/1,n__g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a,activate,f,g} and constructors {c,n__a,n__f,n__g} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(f) = {1}, uargs(g) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {a,activate,f,g} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [11] p(activate) = [4] x1 + [2] p(c) = [1] p(f) = [1] x1 + [5] p(g) = [1] x1 + [4] p(n__a) = [3] p(n__f) = [1] x1 + [4] p(n__g) = [1] x1 + [2] Following rules are strictly oriented: a() = [11] > [3] = n__a() activate(X) = [4] X + [2] > [1] X + [0] = X activate(n__a()) = [14] > [11] = a() activate(n__f(X)) = [4] X + [18] > [4] X + [7] = f(activate(X)) activate(n__g(X)) = [4] X + [10] > [4] X + [6] = g(activate(X)) f(X) = [1] X + [5] > [1] X + [4] = n__f(X) f(f(a())) = [21] > [1] = c(n__f(n__g(n__f(n__a())))) g(X) = [1] X + [4] > [1] X + [2] = n__g(X) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))