WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: compS_f#1(compS_f(x2),x1) -> compS_f#1(x2,S(x1)) compS_f#1(id(),x3) -> S(x3) iter#3(0()) -> id() iter#3(S(x6)) -> compS_f(iter#3(x6)) main(0()) -> 0() main(S(x9)) -> compS_f#1(iter#3(x9),0()) - Signature: {compS_f#1/2,iter#3/1,main/1} / {0/0,S/1,compS_f/1,id/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {compS_f#1,iter#3,main} and constructors {0,S,compS_f,id} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(compS_f) = {1}, uargs(compS_f#1) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {compS_f#1,iter#3,main} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = [1] p(S) = [1] x1 + [2] p(compS_f) = [1] x1 + [6] p(compS_f#1) = [1] x1 + [2] x2 + [12] p(id) = [3] p(iter#3) = [4] x1 + [0] p(main) = [4] x1 + [14] Following rules are strictly oriented: compS_f#1(compS_f(x2),x1) = [2] x1 + [1] x2 + [18] > [2] x1 + [1] x2 + [16] = compS_f#1(x2,S(x1)) compS_f#1(id(),x3) = [2] x3 + [15] > [1] x3 + [2] = S(x3) iter#3(0()) = [4] > [3] = id() iter#3(S(x6)) = [4] x6 + [8] > [4] x6 + [6] = compS_f(iter#3(x6)) main(0()) = [18] > [1] = 0() main(S(x9)) = [4] x9 + [22] > [4] x9 + [14] = compS_f#1(iter#3(x9),0()) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))