WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: =(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) -> and(=(x,u()),=(y,v())) =(.(x,y),nil()) -> false() =(nil(),.(y,z)) -> false() =(nil(),nil()) -> true() del(.(x,.(y,z))) -> f(=(x,y),x,y,z) f(false(),x,y,z) -> .(x,del(.(y,z))) f(true(),x,y,z) -> del(.(y,z)) - Signature: {=/2,del/1,f/4} / {./2,and/2,false/0,nil/0,true/0,u/0,v/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {=,del,f} and constructors {.,and,false,nil,true,u,v} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = NoRestrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(.) = {2}, uargs(f) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {=,del,f} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(.) = 1 + x1 + x2 p(=) = 12 + 4*x1 p(and) = 4 p(del) = 13*x1 p(f) = 2*x1 + 2*x2 + 13*x3 + 13*x4 p(false) = 9 p(nil) = 2 p(true) = 12 p(u) = 0 p(v) = 0 Following rules are strictly oriented: =(.(x,y),.(u(),v())) = 16 + 4*x + 4*y > 4 = and(=(x,u()),=(y,v())) =(.(x,y),nil()) = 16 + 4*x + 4*y > 9 = false() =(nil(),.(y,z)) = 20 > 9 = false() =(nil(),nil()) = 20 > 12 = true() del(.(x,.(y,z))) = 26 + 13*x + 13*y + 13*z > 24 + 10*x + 13*y + 13*z = f(=(x,y),x,y,z) f(false(),x,y,z) = 18 + 2*x + 13*y + 13*z > 14 + x + 13*y + 13*z = .(x,del(.(y,z))) f(true(),x,y,z) = 24 + 2*x + 13*y + 13*z > 13 + 13*y + 13*z = del(.(y,z)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))