WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a() -> n__a() activate(X) -> X activate(n__a()) -> a() activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) f(X) -> n__f(X) f(f(a())) -> f(g(n__f(n__a()))) - Signature: {a/0,activate/1,f/1} / {g/1,n__a/0,n__f/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a,activate,f} and constructors {g,n__a,n__f} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = NoRestrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(f) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {a,activate,f} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = 3 p(activate) = 7 + 8*x1 p(f) = 2 + x1 p(g) = 3 p(n__a) = 0 p(n__f) = 1 + x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: a() = 3 > 0 = n__a() activate(X) = 7 + 8*X > X = X activate(n__a()) = 7 > 3 = a() activate(n__f(X)) = 15 + 8*X > 9 + 8*X = f(activate(X)) f(X) = 2 + X > 1 + X = n__f(X) f(f(a())) = 7 > 5 = f(g(n__f(n__a()))) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))