WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X activate(n__d(X)) -> d(X) activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) activate(n__g(X)) -> g(X) c(X) -> d(activate(X)) d(X) -> n__d(X) f(X) -> n__f(X) f(f(X)) -> c(n__f(n__g(n__f(X)))) g(X) -> n__g(X) h(X) -> c(n__d(X)) - Signature: {activate/1,c/1,d/1,f/1,g/1,h/1} / {n__d/1,n__f/1,n__g/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,c,d,f,g,h} and constructors {n__d,n__f,n__g} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = NoRestrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(d) = {1}, uargs(f) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {activate,c,d,f,g,h} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(activate) = 4 + 6*x1 p(c) = 6 + 6*x1 p(d) = 1 + x1 p(f) = 10 + x1 p(g) = 1 p(h) = 13 + 12*x1 p(n__d) = x1 p(n__f) = 2 + x1 p(n__g) = 0 Following rules are strictly oriented: activate(X) = 4 + 6*X > X = X activate(n__d(X)) = 4 + 6*X > 1 + X = d(X) activate(n__f(X)) = 16 + 6*X > 14 + 6*X = f(activate(X)) activate(n__g(X)) = 4 > 1 = g(X) c(X) = 6 + 6*X > 5 + 6*X = d(activate(X)) d(X) = 1 + X > X = n__d(X) f(X) = 10 + X > 2 + X = n__f(X) f(f(X)) = 20 + X > 18 = c(n__f(n__g(n__f(X)))) g(X) = 1 > 0 = n__g(X) h(X) = 13 + 12*X > 6 + 6*X = c(n__d(X)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))