WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a__c(X) -> c(X) a__c(X) -> d(X) a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(X)) -> a__c(f(g(f(X)))) a__h(X) -> a__c(d(X)) a__h(X) -> h(X) mark(c(X)) -> a__c(X) mark(d(X)) -> d(X) mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) -> g(X) mark(h(X)) -> a__h(mark(X)) - Signature: {a__c/1,a__f/1,a__h/1,mark/1} / {c/1,d/1,f/1,g/1,h/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a__c,a__f,a__h,mark} and constructors {c,d,f,g,h} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = NoRestrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(a__f) = {1}, uargs(a__h) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {a__c,a__f,a__h,mark} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a__c) = 3 p(a__f) = 13 + x1 p(a__h) = 7 + x1 p(c) = 2 p(d) = 0 p(f) = 7 + x1 p(g) = 2 p(h) = 4 + x1 p(mark) = 4 + 2*x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: a__c(X) = 3 > 2 = c(X) a__c(X) = 3 > 0 = d(X) a__f(X) = 13 + X > 7 + X = f(X) a__f(f(X)) = 20 + X > 3 = a__c(f(g(f(X)))) a__h(X) = 7 + X > 3 = a__c(d(X)) a__h(X) = 7 + X > 4 + X = h(X) mark(c(X)) = 8 > 3 = a__c(X) mark(d(X)) = 4 > 0 = d(X) mark(f(X)) = 18 + 2*X > 17 + 2*X = a__f(mark(X)) mark(g(X)) = 8 > 2 = g(X) mark(h(X)) = 12 + 2*X > 11 + 2*X = a__h(mark(X)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))