WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X activate(n__f(X)) -> f(X) f(X) -> n__f(X) f(0()) -> cons(0(),n__f(s(0()))) f(s(0())) -> f(p(s(0()))) p(s(0())) -> 0() - Signature: {activate/1,f/1,p/1} / {0/0,cons/2,n__f/1,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f,p} and constructors {0,cons,n__f,s} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = StronglyLinear, restrict = NoRestrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(stronglyLinear): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(f) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {activate,f,p} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = 1 p(activate) = 8 + x1 p(cons) = 0 p(f) = 3 + x1 p(n__f) = x1 p(p) = 3 p(s) = 15 + x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: activate(X) = 8 + X > X = X activate(n__f(X)) = 8 + X > 3 + X = f(X) f(X) = 3 + X > X = n__f(X) f(0()) = 4 > 0 = cons(0(),n__f(s(0()))) f(s(0())) = 19 > 6 = f(p(s(0()))) p(s(0())) = 3 > 1 = 0() Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))