WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: activate(X) -> X activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) activate(n__h(X)) -> h(activate(X)) f(X) -> g(n__h(n__f(X))) f(X) -> n__f(X) h(X) -> n__h(X) - Signature: {activate/1,f/1,h/1} / {g/1,n__f/1,n__h/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {activate,f,h} and constructors {g,n__f,n__h} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Linear, restrict = NoRestrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(linear): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(f) = {1}, uargs(h) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {activate,f,h} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(activate) = 1 + 8*x1 p(f) = 7 + x1 p(g) = 1 p(h) = 4 + x1 p(n__f) = 2 + x1 p(n__h) = 1 + x1 Following rules are strictly oriented: activate(X) = 1 + 8*X > X = X activate(n__f(X)) = 17 + 8*X > 8 + 8*X = f(activate(X)) activate(n__h(X)) = 9 + 8*X > 5 + 8*X = h(activate(X)) f(X) = 7 + X > 1 = g(n__h(n__f(X))) f(X) = 7 + X > 2 + X = n__f(X) h(X) = 4 + X > 1 + X = n__h(X) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))