MAYBE * Step 1: InnermostRuleRemoval MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))) plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))))) plus(zero(),y) -> y times(x,0()) -> 0() times(x,1()) -> x times(x,plus(y,1())) -> plus(times(x,plus(y,times(1(),0()))),x) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1,true/0,zero/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt,id,if,not,plus,times} and constructors {0,1,false,s ,true,zero} + Applied Processor: InnermostRuleRemoval + Details: Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms. plus(id(x),s(y)) -> s(plus(x,if(gt(s(y),y),y,s(y)))) All above mentioned rules can be savely removed. * Step 2: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))))) plus(zero(),y) -> y times(x,0()) -> 0() times(x,1()) -> x times(x,plus(y,1())) -> plus(times(x,plus(y,times(1(),0()))),x) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1,true/0,zero/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt,id,if,not,plus,times} and constructors {0,1,false,s ,true,zero} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() id#(x) -> c_4() if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() times#(x,0()) -> c_11() times#(x,1()) -> c_12() times#(x,plus(y,1())) -> c_13(plus#(times(x,plus(y,times(1(),0()))),x) ,times#(x,plus(y,times(1(),0()))) ,plus#(y,times(1(),0())) ,times#(1(),0())) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 3: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() id#(x) -> c_4() if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() times#(x,0()) -> c_11() times#(x,1()) -> c_12() times#(x,plus(y,1())) -> c_13(plus#(times(x,plus(y,times(1(),0()))),x) ,times#(x,plus(y,times(1(),0()))) ,plus#(y,times(1(),0())) ,times#(1(),0())) - Weak TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) plus(s(x),x) -> plus(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) plus(s(x),s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))))) plus(zero(),y) -> y times(x,0()) -> 0() times(x,1()) -> x times(x,plus(y,1())) -> plus(times(x,plus(y,times(1(),0()))),x) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2,gt#/2,id#/1,if#/3,not#/1,plus#/2,times#/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1 ,true/0,zero/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/0,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/1,c_8/5,c_9/8,c_10/0,c_11/0,c_12/0,c_13/4} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt#,id#,if#,not#,plus#,times#} and constructors {0,1 ,false,s,true,zero} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() id#(x) -> c_4() if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() times#(x,0()) -> c_11() times#(x,1()) -> c_12() * Step 4: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() id#(x) -> c_4() if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() times#(x,0()) -> c_11() times#(x,1()) -> c_12() - Weak TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2,gt#/2,id#/1,if#/3,not#/1,plus#/2,times#/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1 ,true/0,zero/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/0,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/1,c_8/5,c_9/8,c_10/0,c_11/0,c_12/0,c_13/4} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt#,id#,if#,not#,plus#,times#} and constructors {0,1 ,false,s,true,zero} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12} by application of Pre({2,3,4,5,6,10,11,12}) = {1,7,8,9}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) 2: gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() 3: gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() 4: id#(x) -> c_4() 5: if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() 6: if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() 7: not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) 8: plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) 9: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) 10: plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() 11: times#(x,0()) -> c_11() 12: times#(x,1()) -> c_12() * Step 5: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) - Weak DPs: gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() id#(x) -> c_4() if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() times#(x,0()) -> c_11() times#(x,1()) -> c_12() - Weak TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2,gt#/2,id#/1,if#/3,not#/1,plus#/2,times#/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1 ,true/0,zero/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/0,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/1,c_8/5,c_9/8,c_10/0,c_11/0,c_12/0,c_13/4} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt#,id#,if#,not#,plus#,times#} and constructors {0,1 ,false,s,true,zero} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {2} by application of Pre({2}) = {4}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) 2: not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) 3: plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) 4: plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) 5: gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() 6: gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() 7: id#(x) -> c_4() 8: if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() 9: if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() 10: plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() 11: times#(x,0()) -> c_11() 12: times#(x,1()) -> c_12() * Step 6: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) - Weak DPs: gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() id#(x) -> c_4() if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() times#(x,0()) -> c_11() times#(x,1()) -> c_12() - Weak TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2,gt#/2,id#/1,if#/3,not#/1,plus#/2,times#/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1 ,true/0,zero/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/0,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/1,c_8/5,c_9/8,c_10/0,c_11/0,c_12/0,c_13/4} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt#,id#,if#,not#,plus#,times#} and constructors {0,1 ,false,s,true,zero} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) -->_1 gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3():5 -->_1 gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2():4 -->_1 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 2:S:plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) ,if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)) ,gt#(x,x) ,id#(x) ,id#(x)) -->_1 plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)):3 -->_1 plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10():10 -->_2 if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6():8 -->_2 if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5():7 -->_5 id#(x) -> c_4():6 -->_4 id#(x) -> c_4():6 -->_3 gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3():5 -->_1 plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) ,if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)) ,gt#(x,x) ,id#(x) ,id#(x)):2 -->_3 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 3:S:plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) -->_5 not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())):9 -->_1 plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10():10 -->_4 if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6():8 -->_2 if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6():8 -->_4 if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5():7 -->_2 if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5():7 -->_8 id#(x) -> c_4():6 -->_7 id#(x) -> c_4():6 -->_6 gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3():5 -->_3 gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3():5 -->_6 gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2():4 -->_3 gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2():4 -->_1 plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)):3 -->_1 plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) ,if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)) ,gt#(x,x) ,id#(x) ,id#(x)):2 -->_6 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 -->_3 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 4:W:gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() 5:W:gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() 6:W:id#(x) -> c_4() 7:W:if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() 8:W:if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() 9:W:not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) -->_1 if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6():8 -->_1 if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5():7 10:W:plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() 11:W:times#(x,0()) -> c_11() 12:W:times#(x,1()) -> c_12() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 12: times#(x,1()) -> c_12() 11: times#(x,0()) -> c_11() 6: id#(x) -> c_4() 10: plus#(zero(),y) -> c_10() 9: not#(x) -> c_7(if#(x,false(),true())) 7: if#(false(),x,y) -> c_5() 8: if#(true(),x,y) -> c_6() 4: gt#(s(x),zero()) -> c_2() 5: gt#(zero(),y) -> c_3() * Step 7: SimplifyRHS MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),gt#(x,x),id#(x),id#(x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) - Weak TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2,gt#/2,id#/1,if#/3,not#/1,plus#/2,times#/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1 ,true/0,zero/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/0,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/1,c_8/5,c_9/8,c_10/0,c_11/0,c_12/0,c_13/4} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt#,id#,if#,not#,plus#,times#} and constructors {0,1 ,false,s,true,zero} + Applied Processor: SimplifyRHS + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) -->_1 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 2:S:plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) ,if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)) ,gt#(x,x) ,id#(x) ,id#(x)) -->_1 plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)):3 -->_1 plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) ,if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)) ,gt#(x,x) ,id#(x) ,id#(x)):2 -->_3 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 3:S:plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)) -->_1 plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))) ,if#(gt(x,y),x,y) ,gt#(x,y) ,if#(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y)) ,not#(gt(x,y)) ,gt#(x,y) ,id#(x) ,id#(y)):3 -->_1 plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)) ,if#(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)) ,gt#(x,x) ,id#(x) ,id#(x)):2 -->_6 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 -->_3 gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)):1 Due to missing edges in the depndency graph, the right-hand sides of following rules could be simplified: plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),gt#(x,x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))),gt#(x,y),gt#(x,y)) * Step 8: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: gt#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_1(gt#(x,y)) plus#(s(x),x) -> c_8(plus#(if(gt(x,x),id(x),id(x)),s(x)),gt#(x,x)) plus#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_9(plus#(if(gt(x,y),x,y),if(not(gt(x,y)),id(x),id(y))),gt#(x,y),gt#(x,y)) - Weak TRS: gt(s(x),s(y)) -> gt(x,y) gt(s(x),zero()) -> true() gt(zero(),y) -> false() id(x) -> x if(false(),x,y) -> y if(true(),x,y) -> x not(x) -> if(x,false(),true()) - Signature: {gt/2,id/1,if/3,not/1,plus/2,times/2,gt#/2,id#/1,if#/3,not#/1,plus#/2,times#/2} / {0/0,1/0,false/0,s/1 ,true/0,zero/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/0,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/1,c_8/2,c_9/3,c_10/0,c_11/0,c_12/0,c_13/4} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {gt#,id#,if#,not#,plus#,times#} and constructors {0,1 ,false,s,true,zero} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE