MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: goal(xs) -> subsets(xs) mapconsapp(x,Nil(),rest) -> rest mapconsapp(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> Cons(Cons(x',x),mapconsapp(x',xs,rest)) notEmpty(Cons(x,xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Nil()) -> False() subsets(Cons(x,xs)) -> subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)) subsets(Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) - Weak TRS: subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subs) -> mapconsapp(x,subs,subs) - Signature: {goal/1,mapconsapp/3,notEmpty/1,subsets/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]/2} / {Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,True/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {goal,mapconsapp,notEmpty,subsets ,subsets[Ite][True][Let]} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() Weak DPs subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() - Weak DPs: subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) - Weak TRS: goal(xs) -> subsets(xs) mapconsapp(x,Nil(),rest) -> rest mapconsapp(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> Cons(Cons(x',x),mapconsapp(x',xs,rest)) notEmpty(Cons(x,xs)) -> True() notEmpty(Nil()) -> False() subsets(Cons(x,xs)) -> subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)) subsets(Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subs) -> mapconsapp(x,subs,subs) - Signature: {goal/1,mapconsapp/3,notEmpty/1,subsets/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]/2,goal#/1,mapconsapp#/3,notEmpty#/1 ,subsets#/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#/2} / {Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,True/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/1,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/2 ,c_7/0,c_8/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {goal#,mapconsapp#,notEmpty#,subsets# ,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: mapconsapp(x,Nil(),rest) -> rest mapconsapp(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> Cons(Cons(x',x),mapconsapp(x',xs,rest)) subsets(Cons(x,xs)) -> subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)) subsets(Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subs) -> mapconsapp(x,subs,subs) goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) * Step 3: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() - Weak DPs: subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) - Weak TRS: mapconsapp(x,Nil(),rest) -> rest mapconsapp(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> Cons(Cons(x',x),mapconsapp(x',xs,rest)) subsets(Cons(x,xs)) -> subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)) subsets(Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subs) -> mapconsapp(x,subs,subs) - Signature: {goal/1,mapconsapp/3,notEmpty/1,subsets/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]/2,goal#/1,mapconsapp#/3,notEmpty#/1 ,subsets#/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#/2} / {Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,True/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/1,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/2 ,c_7/0,c_8/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {goal#,mapconsapp#,notEmpty#,subsets# ,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {4,5,7} by application of Pre({4,5,7}) = {1,6}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) 2: mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() 3: mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) 4: notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() 5: notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() 6: subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) 7: subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() 8: subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) * Step 4: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) - Weak DPs: notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) - Weak TRS: mapconsapp(x,Nil(),rest) -> rest mapconsapp(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> Cons(Cons(x',x),mapconsapp(x',xs,rest)) subsets(Cons(x,xs)) -> subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)) subsets(Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subs) -> mapconsapp(x,subs,subs) - Signature: {goal/1,mapconsapp/3,notEmpty/1,subsets/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]/2,goal#/1,mapconsapp#/3,notEmpty#/1 ,subsets#/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#/2} / {Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,True/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/1,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/2 ,c_7/0,c_8/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {goal#,mapconsapp#,notEmpty#,subsets# ,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) -->_1 subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)):4 -->_1 subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7():7 2:S:mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() 3:S:mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) -->_1 mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)):3 -->_1 mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2():2 4:S:subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) -->_1 subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)):8 -->_2 subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7():7 -->_2 subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)):4 5:W:notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() 6:W:notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() 7:W:subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() 8:W:subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) -->_1 mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)):3 -->_1 mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2():2 The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 6: notEmpty#(Nil()) -> c_5() 5: notEmpty#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_4() 7: subsets#(Nil()) -> c_7() * Step 5: RemoveHeads MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) - Weak DPs: subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) - Weak TRS: mapconsapp(x,Nil(),rest) -> rest mapconsapp(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> Cons(Cons(x',x),mapconsapp(x',xs,rest)) subsets(Cons(x,xs)) -> subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)) subsets(Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subs) -> mapconsapp(x,subs,subs) - Signature: {goal/1,mapconsapp/3,notEmpty/1,subsets/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]/2,goal#/1,mapconsapp#/3,notEmpty#/1 ,subsets#/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#/2} / {Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,True/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/1,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/2 ,c_7/0,c_8/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {goal#,mapconsapp#,notEmpty#,subsets# ,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveHeads + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)) -->_1 subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)):4 2:S:mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() 3:S:mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) -->_1 mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)):3 -->_1 mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2():2 4:S:subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) -->_1 subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)):8 -->_2 subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)):4 8:W:subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) -->_1 mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)):3 -->_1 mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2():2 Following roots of the dependency graph are removed, as the considered set of starting terms is closed under reduction with respect to these rules (modulo compound contexts). [(1,goal#(xs) -> c_1(subsets#(xs)))] * Step 6: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: mapconsapp#(x,Nil(),rest) -> c_2() mapconsapp#(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> c_3(mapconsapp#(x',xs,rest)) subsets#(Cons(x,xs)) -> c_6(subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)),subsets#(xs)) - Weak DPs: subsets[Ite][True][Let]#(Cons(x,xs),subs) -> c_8(mapconsapp#(x,subs,subs)) - Weak TRS: mapconsapp(x,Nil(),rest) -> rest mapconsapp(x',Cons(x,xs),rest) -> Cons(Cons(x',x),mapconsapp(x',xs,rest)) subsets(Cons(x,xs)) -> subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subsets(xs)) subsets(Nil()) -> Cons(Nil(),Nil()) subsets[Ite][True][Let](Cons(x,xs),subs) -> mapconsapp(x,subs,subs) - Signature: {goal/1,mapconsapp/3,notEmpty/1,subsets/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]/2,goal#/1,mapconsapp#/3,notEmpty#/1 ,subsets#/1,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#/2} / {Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,True/0,c_1/1,c_2/0,c_3/1,c_4/0,c_5/0,c_6/2 ,c_7/0,c_8/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {goal#,mapconsapp#,notEmpty#,subsets# ,subsets[Ite][True][Let]#} and constructors {Cons,False,Nil,True} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE