MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) first(0(),X) -> nil() first(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> cons(Y,first(X,Z)) half(0()) -> 0() half(dbl(X)) -> X half(s(0())) -> 0() half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X)) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X),dbl(X))) terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)),terms(s(N))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,half/1,sqr/1,terms/1} / {0/0,cons/2,nil/0,recip/1,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add,dbl,first,half,sqr,terms} and constructors {0,cons ,nil,recip,s} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs add#(0(),X) -> c_1() add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) dbl#(0()) -> c_3() dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) first#(0(),X) -> c_5() first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) half#(0()) -> c_7() half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() half#(s(0())) -> c_9() half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) sqr#(0()) -> c_11() sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: add#(0(),X) -> c_1() add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) dbl#(0()) -> c_3() dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) first#(0(),X) -> c_5() first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) half#(0()) -> c_7() half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() half#(s(0())) -> c_9() half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) sqr#(0()) -> c_11() sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) - Weak TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) first(0(),X) -> nil() first(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> cons(Y,first(X,Z)) half(0()) -> 0() half(dbl(X)) -> X half(s(0())) -> 0() half(s(s(X))) -> s(half(X)) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X),dbl(X))) terms(N) -> cons(recip(sqr(N)),terms(s(N))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,half/1,sqr/1,terms/1,add#/2,dbl#/1,first#/2,half#/1,sqr#/1,terms#/1} / {0/0,cons/2 ,nil/0,recip/1,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/0,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/1,c_7/0,c_8/0,c_9/0,c_10/1,c_11/0,c_12/3,c_13/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add#,dbl#,first#,half#,sqr#,terms#} and constructors {0 ,cons,nil,recip,s} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X),dbl(X))) add#(0(),X) -> c_1() add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) dbl#(0()) -> c_3() dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) first#(0(),X) -> c_5() first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) half#(0()) -> c_7() half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() half#(s(0())) -> c_9() half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) sqr#(0()) -> c_11() sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) * Step 3: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: add#(0(),X) -> c_1() add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) dbl#(0()) -> c_3() dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) first#(0(),X) -> c_5() first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) half#(0()) -> c_7() half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() half#(s(0())) -> c_9() half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) sqr#(0()) -> c_11() sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) - Weak TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X),dbl(X))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,half/1,sqr/1,terms/1,add#/2,dbl#/1,first#/2,half#/1,sqr#/1,terms#/1} / {0/0,cons/2 ,nil/0,recip/1,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/0,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/1,c_7/0,c_8/0,c_9/0,c_10/1,c_11/0,c_12/3,c_13/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add#,dbl#,first#,half#,sqr#,terms#} and constructors {0 ,cons,nil,recip,s} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1,3,5,7,8,9,11} by application of Pre({1,3,5,7,8,9,11}) = {2,4,6,10,12,13}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: add#(0(),X) -> c_1() 2: add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) 3: dbl#(0()) -> c_3() 4: dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) 5: first#(0(),X) -> c_5() 6: first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) 7: half#(0()) -> c_7() 8: half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() 9: half#(s(0())) -> c_9() 10: half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) 11: sqr#(0()) -> c_11() 12: sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) 13: terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) * Step 4: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) - Weak DPs: add#(0(),X) -> c_1() dbl#(0()) -> c_3() first#(0(),X) -> c_5() half#(0()) -> c_7() half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() half#(s(0())) -> c_9() sqr#(0()) -> c_11() - Weak TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X),dbl(X))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,half/1,sqr/1,terms/1,add#/2,dbl#/1,first#/2,half#/1,sqr#/1,terms#/1} / {0/0,cons/2 ,nil/0,recip/1,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/0,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/1,c_7/0,c_8/0,c_9/0,c_10/1,c_11/0,c_12/3,c_13/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add#,dbl#,first#,half#,sqr#,terms#} and constructors {0 ,cons,nil,recip,s} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) -->_1 add#(0(),X) -> c_1():7 -->_1 add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)):1 2:S:dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) -->_1 dbl#(0()) -> c_3():8 -->_1 dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)):2 3:S:first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) -->_1 first#(0(),X) -> c_5():9 -->_1 first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)):3 4:S:half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) -->_1 half#(s(0())) -> c_9():12 -->_1 half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8():11 -->_1 half#(0()) -> c_7():10 -->_1 half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)):4 5:S:sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) -->_2 sqr#(0()) -> c_11():13 -->_3 dbl#(0()) -> c_3():8 -->_1 add#(0(),X) -> c_1():7 -->_2 sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)):5 -->_3 dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)):2 -->_1 add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)):1 6:S:terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) -->_1 sqr#(0()) -> c_11():13 -->_2 terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))):6 -->_1 sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)):5 7:W:add#(0(),X) -> c_1() 8:W:dbl#(0()) -> c_3() 9:W:first#(0(),X) -> c_5() 10:W:half#(0()) -> c_7() 11:W:half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() 12:W:half#(s(0())) -> c_9() 13:W:sqr#(0()) -> c_11() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 13: sqr#(0()) -> c_11() 10: half#(0()) -> c_7() 11: half#(dbl(X)) -> c_8() 12: half#(s(0())) -> c_9() 9: first#(0(),X) -> c_5() 8: dbl#(0()) -> c_3() 7: add#(0(),X) -> c_1() * Step 5: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: add#(s(X),Y) -> c_2(add#(X,Y)) dbl#(s(X)) -> c_4(dbl#(X)) first#(s(X),cons(Y,Z)) -> c_6(first#(X,Z)) half#(s(s(X))) -> c_10(half#(X)) sqr#(s(X)) -> c_12(add#(sqr(X),dbl(X)),sqr#(X),dbl#(X)) terms#(N) -> c_13(sqr#(N),terms#(s(N))) - Weak TRS: add(0(),X) -> X add(s(X),Y) -> s(add(X,Y)) dbl(0()) -> 0() dbl(s(X)) -> s(s(dbl(X))) sqr(0()) -> 0() sqr(s(X)) -> s(add(sqr(X),dbl(X))) - Signature: {add/2,dbl/1,first/2,half/1,sqr/1,terms/1,add#/2,dbl#/1,first#/2,half#/1,sqr#/1,terms#/1} / {0/0,cons/2 ,nil/0,recip/1,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/0,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/1,c_7/0,c_8/0,c_9/0,c_10/1,c_11/0,c_12/3,c_13/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {add#,dbl#,first#,half#,sqr#,terms#} and constructors {0 ,cons,nil,recip,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE