MAYBE * Step 1: InnermostRuleRemoval MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x) -> g(f(x)) g(x) -> a() g(f(x)) -> x - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {a/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {a} + Applied Processor: InnermostRuleRemoval + Details: Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms. g(f(x)) -> x All above mentioned rules can be savely removed. * Step 2: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(x) -> g(f(x)) g(x) -> a() - Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {a/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {a} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)) g#(x) -> c_2() Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 3: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)) g#(x) -> c_2() - Weak TRS: f(x) -> g(f(x)) g(x) -> a() - Signature: {f/1,g/1,f#/1,g#/1} / {a/0,c_1/2,c_2/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,g#} and constructors {a} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {2} by application of Pre({2}) = {1}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)) 2: g#(x) -> c_2() * Step 4: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)) - Weak DPs: g#(x) -> c_2() - Weak TRS: f(x) -> g(f(x)) g(x) -> a() - Signature: {f/1,g/1,f#/1,g#/1} / {a/0,c_1/2,c_2/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,g#} and constructors {a} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)) -->_1 g#(x) -> c_2():2 -->_2 f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)):1 2:W:g#(x) -> c_2() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 2: g#(x) -> c_2() * Step 5: SimplifyRHS MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)) - Weak TRS: f(x) -> g(f(x)) g(x) -> a() - Signature: {f/1,g/1,f#/1,g#/1} / {a/0,c_1/2,c_2/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,g#} and constructors {a} + Applied Processor: SimplifyRHS + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)) -->_2 f#(x) -> c_1(g#(f(x)),f#(x)):1 Due to missing edges in the depndency graph, the right-hand sides of following rules could be simplified: f#(x) -> c_1(f#(x)) * Step 6: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(x) -> c_1(f#(x)) - Weak TRS: f(x) -> g(f(x)) g(x) -> a() - Signature: {f/1,g/1,f#/1,g#/1} / {a/0,c_1/1,c_2/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,g#} and constructors {a} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: f#(x) -> c_1(f#(x)) * Step 7: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: f#(x) -> c_1(f#(x)) - Signature: {f/1,g/1,f#/1,g#/1} / {a/0,c_1/1,c_2/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f#,g#} and constructors {a} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE