MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: badd(x,Nil()) -> x badd(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> badd(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)) goal(x,y) -> badd(x,y) - Signature: {badd/2,goal/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {badd,goal} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) - Weak TRS: badd(x,Nil()) -> x badd(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> badd(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)) goal(x,y) -> badd(x,y) - Signature: {badd/2,goal/2,badd#/2,goal#/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {badd#,goal#} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: badd(x,Nil()) -> x badd(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> badd(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)) badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) * Step 3: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) - Weak TRS: badd(x,Nil()) -> x badd(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> badd(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)) - Signature: {badd/2,goal/2,badd#/2,goal#/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {badd#,goal#} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1} by application of Pre({1}) = {2,3}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() 2: badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) 3: goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) * Step 4: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) - Weak DPs: badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() - Weak TRS: badd(x,Nil()) -> x badd(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> badd(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)) - Signature: {badd/2,goal/2,badd#/2,goal#/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {badd#,goal#} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) -->_2 badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():3 -->_1 badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():3 -->_2 badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)):1 -->_1 badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)):1 2:S:goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) -->_1 badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():3 -->_1 badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)):1 3:W:badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 3: badd#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() * Step 5: RemoveHeads MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) - Weak TRS: badd(x,Nil()) -> x badd(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> badd(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)) - Signature: {badd/2,goal/2,badd#/2,goal#/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {badd#,goal#} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: RemoveHeads + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) -->_2 badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)):1 -->_1 badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)):1 2:S:goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)) -->_1 badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)):1 Following roots of the dependency graph are removed, as the considered set of starting terms is closed under reduction with respect to these rules (modulo compound contexts). [(2,goal#(x,y) -> c_3(badd#(x,y)))] * Step 6: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: badd#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(badd#(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)),badd#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: badd(x,Nil()) -> x badd(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> badd(Cons(Nil(),Nil()),badd(x',xs)) - Signature: {badd/2,goal/2,badd#/2,goal#/2} / {Cons/2,Nil/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {badd#,goal#} and constructors {Cons,Nil} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE