MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: int(x,x) -> cons(x,nil()) int(0(),s(y)) -> cons(0(),int(s(0()),s(y))) int(s(x),0()) -> nil() int(s(x),s(y)) -> intlist(int(x,y)) intlist(cons(x,y)) -> cons(s(x),intlist(y)) intlist(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(s(x),nil()) intlist(nil()) -> nil() - Signature: {int/2,intlist/1} / {0/0,cons/2,nil/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {int,intlist} and constructors {0,cons,nil,s} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs int#(x,x) -> c_1() int#(0(),s(y)) -> c_2(int#(s(0()),s(y))) int#(s(x),0()) -> c_3() int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)) intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)) intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6() intlist#(nil()) -> c_7() Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: int#(x,x) -> c_1() int#(0(),s(y)) -> c_2(int#(s(0()),s(y))) int#(s(x),0()) -> c_3() int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)) intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)) intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6() intlist#(nil()) -> c_7() - Weak TRS: int(x,x) -> cons(x,nil()) int(0(),s(y)) -> cons(0(),int(s(0()),s(y))) int(s(x),0()) -> nil() int(s(x),s(y)) -> intlist(int(x,y)) intlist(cons(x,y)) -> cons(s(x),intlist(y)) intlist(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(s(x),nil()) intlist(nil()) -> nil() - Signature: {int/2,intlist/1,int#/2,intlist#/1} / {0/0,cons/2,nil/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/0,c_4/2,c_5/1,c_6/0,c_7/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {int#,intlist#} and constructors {0,cons,nil,s} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1,3,6,7} by application of Pre({1,3,6,7}) = {2,4,5}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: int#(x,x) -> c_1() 2: int#(0(),s(y)) -> c_2(int#(s(0()),s(y))) 3: int#(s(x),0()) -> c_3() 4: int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)) 5: intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)) 6: intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6() 7: intlist#(nil()) -> c_7() * Step 3: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: int#(0(),s(y)) -> c_2(int#(s(0()),s(y))) int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)) intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)) - Weak DPs: int#(x,x) -> c_1() int#(s(x),0()) -> c_3() intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6() intlist#(nil()) -> c_7() - Weak TRS: int(x,x) -> cons(x,nil()) int(0(),s(y)) -> cons(0(),int(s(0()),s(y))) int(s(x),0()) -> nil() int(s(x),s(y)) -> intlist(int(x,y)) intlist(cons(x,y)) -> cons(s(x),intlist(y)) intlist(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(s(x),nil()) intlist(nil()) -> nil() - Signature: {int/2,intlist/1,int#/2,intlist#/1} / {0/0,cons/2,nil/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/0,c_4/2,c_5/1,c_6/0,c_7/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {int#,intlist#} and constructors {0,cons,nil,s} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:int#(0(),s(y)) -> c_2(int#(s(0()),s(y))) -->_1 int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)):2 -->_1 int#(x,x) -> c_1():4 2:S:int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)) -->_1 intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)):3 -->_1 intlist#(nil()) -> c_7():7 -->_1 intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6():6 -->_2 int#(s(x),0()) -> c_3():5 -->_2 int#(x,x) -> c_1():4 -->_2 int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)):2 -->_2 int#(0(),s(y)) -> c_2(int#(s(0()),s(y))):1 3:S:intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)) -->_1 intlist#(nil()) -> c_7():7 -->_1 intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6():6 -->_1 intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)):3 4:W:int#(x,x) -> c_1() 5:W:int#(s(x),0()) -> c_3() 6:W:intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6() 7:W:intlist#(nil()) -> c_7() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 4: int#(x,x) -> c_1() 5: int#(s(x),0()) -> c_3() 6: intlist#(cons(x,nil())) -> c_6() 7: intlist#(nil()) -> c_7() * Step 4: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: int#(0(),s(y)) -> c_2(int#(s(0()),s(y))) int#(s(x),s(y)) -> c_4(intlist#(int(x,y)),int#(x,y)) intlist#(cons(x,y)) -> c_5(intlist#(y)) - Weak TRS: int(x,x) -> cons(x,nil()) int(0(),s(y)) -> cons(0(),int(s(0()),s(y))) int(s(x),0()) -> nil() int(s(x),s(y)) -> intlist(int(x,y)) intlist(cons(x,y)) -> cons(s(x),intlist(y)) intlist(cons(x,nil())) -> cons(s(x),nil()) intlist(nil()) -> nil() - Signature: {int/2,intlist/1,int#/2,intlist#/1} / {0/0,cons/2,nil/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/0,c_4/2,c_5/1,c_6/0,c_7/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {int#,intlist#} and constructors {0,cons,nil,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE