MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: after(0(),XS) -> XS after(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> after(N,XS) from(X) -> cons(X,from(s(X))) - Signature: {after/2,from/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {after,from} and constructors {0,cons,s} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) - Weak TRS: after(0(),XS) -> XS after(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> after(N,XS) from(X) -> cons(X,from(s(X))) - Signature: {after/2,from/1,after#/2,from#/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {after#,from#} and constructors {0,cons,s} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) * Step 3: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) - Signature: {after/2,from/1,after#/2,from#/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {after#,from#} and constructors {0,cons,s} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1} by application of Pre({1}) = {2}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() 2: after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) 3: from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) * Step 4: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) - Weak DPs: after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() - Signature: {after/2,from/1,after#/2,from#/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {after#,from#} and constructors {0,cons,s} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) -->_1 after#(0(),XS) -> c_1():3 -->_1 after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)):1 2:S:from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) -->_1 from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))):2 3:W:after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 3: after#(0(),XS) -> c_1() * Step 5: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: after#(s(N),cons(X,XS)) -> c_2(after#(N,XS)) from#(X) -> c_3(from#(s(X))) - Signature: {after/2,from/1,after#/2,from#/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {after#,from#} and constructors {0,cons,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE