MAYBE * Step 1: DependencyPairs MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: cons(x,cons(y,z)) -> big() inf(x) -> cons(x,inf(s(x))) - Signature: {cons/2,inf/1} / {big/0,s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cons,inf} and constructors {big,s} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs cons#(x,cons(y,z)) -> c_1() inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: PredecessorEstimation MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: cons#(x,cons(y,z)) -> c_1() inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))) - Weak TRS: cons(x,cons(y,z)) -> big() inf(x) -> cons(x,inf(s(x))) - Signature: {cons/2,inf/1,cons#/2,inf#/1} / {big/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cons#,inf#} and constructors {big,s} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1} by application of Pre({1}) = {2}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: cons#(x,cons(y,z)) -> c_1() 2: inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))) * Step 3: RemoveWeakSuffixes MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))) - Weak DPs: cons#(x,cons(y,z)) -> c_1() - Weak TRS: cons(x,cons(y,z)) -> big() inf(x) -> cons(x,inf(s(x))) - Signature: {cons/2,inf/1,cons#/2,inf#/1} / {big/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cons#,inf#} and constructors {big,s} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))) -->_1 cons#(x,cons(y,z)) -> c_1():2 -->_2 inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))):1 2:W:cons#(x,cons(y,z)) -> c_1() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 2: cons#(x,cons(y,z)) -> c_1() * Step 4: SimplifyRHS MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))) - Weak TRS: cons(x,cons(y,z)) -> big() inf(x) -> cons(x,inf(s(x))) - Signature: {cons/2,inf/1,cons#/2,inf#/1} / {big/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/2} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cons#,inf#} and constructors {big,s} + Applied Processor: SimplifyRHS + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))) -->_2 inf#(x) -> c_2(cons#(x,inf(s(x))),inf#(s(x))):1 Due to missing edges in the depndency graph, the right-hand sides of following rules could be simplified: inf#(x) -> c_2(inf#(s(x))) * Step 5: UsableRules MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: inf#(x) -> c_2(inf#(s(x))) - Weak TRS: cons(x,cons(y,z)) -> big() inf(x) -> cons(x,inf(s(x))) - Signature: {cons/2,inf/1,cons#/2,inf#/1} / {big/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cons#,inf#} and constructors {big,s} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: inf#(x) -> c_2(inf#(s(x))) * Step 6: Failure MAYBE + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: inf#(x) -> c_2(inf#(s(x))) - Signature: {cons/2,inf/1,cons#/2,inf#/1} / {big/0,s/1,c_1/0,c_2/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cons#,inf#} and constructors {big,s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is still open. MAYBE