WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            cond_prefix_s1_s2_2(False(),x2,x1) -> False()
            cond_prefix_s1_s2_2(True(),x2,x1) -> prefix#2(x2,x1)
            eq#2(0(),0()) -> True()
            eq#2(0(),S(x16)) -> False()
            eq#2(S(x16),0()) -> False()
            eq#2(S(x4),S(x2)) -> eq#2(x4,x2)
            main(x2,x1) -> prefix#2(x2,x1)
            prefix#2(Cons(x4,x2),Nil()) -> False()
            prefix#2(Cons(x8,x6),Cons(x4,x2)) -> cond_prefix_s1_s2_2(eq#2(x8,x4),x6,x2)
            prefix#2(Nil(),x2) -> True()
        - Signature:
            {cond_prefix_s1_s2_2/3,eq#2/2,main/2,prefix#2/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cond_prefix_s1_s2_2,eq#2,main
            ,prefix#2} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 2.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          0_0() -> 2
          Cons_0(2,2) -> 2
          False_0() -> 2
          False_1() -> 1
          False_2() -> 1
          Nil_0() -> 2
          S_0(2) -> 2
          True_0() -> 2
          True_1() -> 1
          cond_prefix_s1_s2_2_0(2,2,2) -> 1
          cond_prefix_s1_s2_2_1(1,2,2) -> 1
          eq#2_0(2,2) -> 1
          eq#2_1(2,2) -> 1
          main_0(2,2) -> 1
          prefix#2_0(2,2) -> 1
          prefix#2_1(2,2) -> 1
          prefix#2_2(2,2) -> 1
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            cond_prefix_s1_s2_2(False(),x2,x1) -> False()
            cond_prefix_s1_s2_2(True(),x2,x1) -> prefix#2(x2,x1)
            eq#2(0(),0()) -> True()
            eq#2(0(),S(x16)) -> False()
            eq#2(S(x16),0()) -> False()
            eq#2(S(x4),S(x2)) -> eq#2(x4,x2)
            main(x2,x1) -> prefix#2(x2,x1)
            prefix#2(Cons(x4,x2),Nil()) -> False()
            prefix#2(Cons(x8,x6),Cons(x4,x2)) -> cond_prefix_s1_s2_2(eq#2(x8,x4),x6,x2)
            prefix#2(Nil(),x2) -> True()
        - Signature:
            {cond_prefix_s1_s2_2/3,eq#2/2,main/2,prefix#2/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {cond_prefix_s1_s2_2,eq#2,main
            ,prefix#2} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))