WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) * Step 1: DependencyPairs WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: eq(x,x) -> true() - Signature: {eq/2} / {true/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {eq} and constructors {true} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs eq#(x,x) -> c_1() Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. * Step 2: PredecessorEstimation WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: eq#(x,x) -> c_1() - Weak TRS: eq(x,x) -> true() - Signature: {eq/2,eq#/2} / {true/0,c_1/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {eq#} and constructors {true} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {1} by application of Pre({1}) = {}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: eq#(x,x) -> c_1() * Step 3: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: eq#(x,x) -> c_1() - Weak TRS: eq(x,x) -> true() - Signature: {eq/2,eq#/2} / {true/0,c_1/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {eq#} and constructors {true} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:W:eq#(x,x) -> c_1() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 1: eq#(x,x) -> c_1() * Step 4: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: eq(x,x) -> true() - Signature: {eq/2,eq#/2} / {true/0,c_1/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {eq#} and constructors {true} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(1))