WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            main(x1) -> scheme#2(x1)
            scheme#2(Cons(x10,Cons(x16,x24))) -> scheme#2(x24)
            scheme#2(Nil()) -> Nil()
        - Signature:
            {main/1,scheme#2/1} / {Cons/2,Nil/0}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {main,scheme#2} and constructors {Cons,Nil}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          Cons_0(2,2) -> 2
          Nil_0() -> 2
          Nil_1() -> 1
          main_0(2) -> 1
          scheme#2_0(2) -> 1
          scheme#2_1(2) -> 1
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            main(x1) -> scheme#2(x1)
            scheme#2(Cons(x10,Cons(x16,x24))) -> scheme#2(x24)
            scheme#2(Nil()) -> Nil()
        - Signature:
            {main/1,scheme#2/1} / {Cons/2,Nil/0}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {main,scheme#2} and constructors {Cons,Nil}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))