WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
* Step 1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            and(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) -> and(y,band(x,z),x)
        - Signature:
            {and/3} / {band/2,not/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {and} and constructors {band,not}
    + Applied Processor:
        NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
        The following argument positions are considered usable:
          none
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          {and}
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
           p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
          p(band) = [0]                  
           p(not) = [3]                  
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        and(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) = [1] y + [3]       
                                  > [1] y + [0]       
                                  = and(y,band(x,z),x)
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            and(not(not(x)),y,not(z)) -> and(y,band(x,z),x)
        - Signature:
            {and/3} / {band/2,not/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {and} and constructors {band,not}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(1))