WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
* Step 1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            eq0(0(),0()) -> S(0())
            eq0(0(),S(x)) -> 0()
            eq0(S(x),0()) -> 0()
            eq0(S(x'),S(x)) -> eq0(x',x)
        - Signature:
            {eq0/2} / {0/0,S/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {eq0} and constructors {0,S}
    + Applied Processor:
        Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    + Details:
        The problem is match-bounded by 1.
        The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
          0_0() -> 2
          0_1() -> 1
          0_1() -> 3
          S_0(2) -> 2
          S_1(3) -> 1
          eq0_0(2,2) -> 1
          eq0_1(2,2) -> 1
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            eq0(0(),0()) -> S(0())
            eq0(0(),S(x)) -> 0()
            eq0(S(x),0()) -> 0()
            eq0(S(x'),S(x)) -> eq0(x',x)
        - Signature:
            {eq0/2} / {0/0,S/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {eq0} and constructors {0,S}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))